Dewall v. City of Sioux City
| Citation | 164 N.W. 640,181 Iowa 333 |
| Decision Date | 20 October 1917 |
| Docket Number | No. 31515.,31515. |
| Parties | DEWALL v. CITY OF SIOUX CITY. |
| Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from District Court, Woodbury County; J. W. Anderson, Judge.
Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $400 damages which she claims to have suffered because of the icy condition of an alley crossing in defendant city. Affirmed.Griffin & Page and Schmidt & Pike, all of Sioux City, for appellant.
Oliver, Harding & Oliver, of Sioux City, for appellee.
The injury complained of was received upon one of the principal business streets of defendant city, and it is alleged was caused by the city negligently permitting accumulations of snow and ice to remain upon an alley crossing after the surface thereof had become rough, rigid, slippery, and uneven. Plaintiff testified that she had frequently passed over the place of the accident, and knew of the presence of snow and ice upon the crossing, and that same had, by the tramping of pedestrians and other causes, become rough and uneven.
Evidence was introduced that on the 5th of February, 1915, there were 13 inches of snow on the ground, and no thawing or snow thereafter prior to the 9th; that on the evening of February 9th there were 9.5 inches of snow on the ground, and on the evening of the 11th 8.4 inches; that on the 12th the maximum temperature was 35 degrees and the minimum 20; that on the afternoon of the 12th, about 4 o'clock p. m. it began to rain, which continued until about 2 o'clock the following morning. Plaintiff claims the accident in question occured about 7 o'clock on the morning of the 13th, and the evidence shows that at 8 o'clock that morning the temperature was 30 degrees above zero. According to the testimony of plaintiff, the morning was cloudy and not very light; the surface of the snow was rough and icy and was “dirty frozen snow.” Other testimony as to the condition of the crossing was offered by plaintiff which tended to corroborate her statement. No testimony was offered by defendant tending to show that the crossing was not in the condition claimed by plaintiff. Plaintiff testified that she did not realize that the crossing was dangerous.
[1] It has been repeatedly held by this court that where snow, which has fallen upon the sidewalk, is permitted to remain until the surface thereof, by thawing and freezing, or by reason of travel thereover, has become rough, uneven, rigid, and slippery, and where this condition has existed for such length of time that same has become known to the authorities or should have been known to them in the exercise of reasonable care, the municipality will be liable for damages to one injured while attempting, in the exercise of ordinary care, to pass over said walk. Huston v. City of Council Bluffs, 101 Iowa, 33, 69 N. W. 1130, 36 L. R. A. 211;Dempsey v. City of Dubuque, 150 Iowa, 260, 132 N. W. 758;Beirness v. City of Missouri Valley, 162 Iowa, 720, 144 N. W. 628, 51 L. R. A. (N. S.) 218;Griffin v. City of Marion, 163 Iowa, 435, 144 N. W. 1011;Finnane v. City of Perry, 164 Iowa, 171, 145 N. W. 494;Hodges v. City of Waterloo, 109 Iowa, 444, 80 N. W. 523;Rose v. City of Ft. Dodge, 155 N. W. 170;Covert v. Town of Lovilia, 167 Iowa, 163, 149 N. W. 67.
Recent rains may have caused the rough and uneven places upon the crossing to become more slippery and...
To continue reading
Request your trial