Dias v. I.N.S.
| Decision Date | 27 November 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. 02-2074.,02-2074. |
| Citation | 311 F.3d 456 |
| Parties | Antonio Vicente DIAS, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit |
Joseph F. Dugan on Petition for Review of an Order of The Board of Immigration Appeals for petitioner.
Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division, Christopher C. Fuller, Senior Litigation Counsel, Office of Immigration Litigation, and Brenda M. O'Malley, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, Department of Justice, on Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Petition for Review for Lack of Jurisdiction and Opposition to Petitioner's Motion for a Stay of Removal for respondent.
Before LYNCH, Circuit Judge, CYR, Senior Circuit Judge, and LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
In 1995, petitioner Dias was convicted in the trial court for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts of a violation of the drug laws of that state. At the time of the conviction, petitioner was eligible for a discretionary waiver of deportation pursuant to former § 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. In 1996, § 440(d) of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) restricted the availability of § 212(c) relief for aliens convicted of a number of felonies, including petitioner's controlled substance offense.
The issue presented by this petition for review is whether application of the new law to petitioner would have an impermissible retroactive effect. Relying on INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001), petitioner argues that it would. In St. Cyr, the Court held that, because new legal consequences would attach to events completed before its enactment, application of AEDPA to alien criminal defendants who pled guilty prior to AEDPA would constitute an "impermissible retroactive effect." Id., at 321, 121 S.Ct. 2271. However, the decision in St. Cyr relied on the Court's recognition that (1) plea agreements generally involve a quid pro quo between a defendant and the government and (2) that aliens often attach much importance to the immigration consequences of the decision whether or not to enter into an agreement. "Preserving the client's right to remain in the United States may be more important to the client than any potential jail sentence." St. Cyr, 533 U.S. at 322, 121 S.Ct. 2271 (citation omitted). Therefore, the potential for unfairness to one who pled guilty in reliance on immigration law as it existed at the time of the plea would be significant if the new law were applied retroactively. For this reason, the Court held that alien criminal defendants who pled guilty prior to AEDPA are eligible to apply for discretionary relief under former § 212(c) of the INA.
In contrast, those alien criminal defendants who chose to go to trial, prior to the change wrought by AEDPA, were not relying on immigration law as it existed at the time in making that decision. The inquiry into retroactive application of a statute requires a "commonsense, functional...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Evangelista v. Ashcroft
...2004 WL 193576, at *4 (2d Cir. Feb.3, 2004), 2004 U.S.App. LEXIS 1569, at *15-*17; Rankine, 319 F.3d at 102; Dias v. INS, 311 F.3d 456, 458 (1st Cir.2002) (per curiam), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 123 S.Ct. 2574, 156 L.Ed.2d 603 (2003); Chambers v. Reno, 307 F.3d 284, 286 (4th Cir.2002); Ar......
-
U.S. v. Lepore, CRIM.A.03-10158-WGY.
...St. Cyr, which found no need to engage in such an inquiry to reach its holding. Similarly, the government's invocation of Dias v. INS, 311 F.3d 456, 458 (1st Cir.2002), is inapposite, as that case stands only for the unremarkable proposition that St. Cyr does not prevent retroactive applica......
-
Hernandez v. Gonzales
...invoking the quid pro quo language from it. See Montenegro v. Ashcroft, 355 F.3d 1035 (7th Cir.2004) (per curiam); Dias v. INS, 311 F.3d 456 (1st Cir. 2002); Armendariz-Montoya v. Sonchik, 291 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir.2002); Brooks v. Ashcroft, 283 F.3d 1268 (11th Cir.2002). A related argument ad......
-
Hem v. Maurer
...not "detrimentally rely on the availability of § 212(c) relief"); Rankine v. Reno, 319 F.3d 93, 100 (2d Cir.2003) (same); Dias v. INS, 311 F.3d 456, 458 (1st Cir.2002) (holding that IIRIRA's repeal of § 212(c) was not retroactive to petitioners who did not rely on pre-IIRIRA law because the......
-
Retroactivity and immigrant crimes since St. Cyr: emerging signs of judicial restraint.
...underlying crime that could render them deportable and, had they succeeded, [section] 212(c) relief would be irrelevant."); Dias v. INS, 311 F.3d 456, 458 (1st Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (retusing[section] 212(c) relief because the petitioner, in going to trial, allegedly did not rely on the s......
-
Determining the retroactive effect of laws altering the consequences of criminal convictions.
...a change in sentencing guidelines does not apply to those whose crimes occurred prior to the new guidelines). (10.) See Dias v. I.N.S., 311 F.3d 456, 458 (1st Cir. 2002) (per curiam); Chambers v. Reno, 307 F.3d 284, 290-91 (4th Cir. 2002); Perez v. Elwood, 294 F.3d 552, 559-60 (3d Cir. 2002......