Dias v. State, 4126
| Decision Date | 11 December 1963 |
| Docket Number | No. 4126,4126 |
| Parties | James DIAS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Lee Roy Horton, Jr., Public Defender, Lake Wales, for appellant.
Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert R. Critteden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lakeland, for appellee.
An information was filed against the appellant, James Dias, charging him with breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny. He appeared at the arraignment without benefit of counsel and pleaded guilty. On December 31, 1962, after being adjudged guilty, Dias was sentenced to a term of two years in the State Penitentiary.
On May 14, 1963, the appellant filed a motion 1 to vacate the judgment and sentence on the ground that he had entered his plea of guilty without the benefit and advice of counsel. With the motion he filed an affidavit of insolbency, stating that he was without funds for the purpose of prosecuting the motion; that he had no property; and that he had not divested himself of any property for the purpose of benefitting from the oath of insolvency. The court entered an order declaring Dias insolvent. On May 15, 1963, the motion to vacate the judgment and sentence was denied, the order reciting that Dias had entered a voluntary plea of guilty without requesting that counsel be appointed on his behalf and that he had freely admitted that he was guilty of the offenses charged. From this the trial court concluded that Dias had waived his right to counsel. These facts are not sufficient to constitute a waiver. King v. State, Fla.App.1963, 157 So.2d 440.
Notwithstanding the fact that the trial court's order was based on this erroneous reason, the order must nevertheless be affirmed for the reason that the motion to vacate does not allege that Dias was insolvent and unable to obtain counsel at the time he entered his plea of guilty. Savage v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 566. The record does not disclose any affidavit or order of insolvency prior to or at the time of the arraignment and plea. The affidavit of insolvency submitted with the motion to vacate is evidence of appellant's insolvency at that time, and the order of insolvency establishes his insolvency at such time; but these do not have the retroactive effect of either alleging, showing or establishing insolvency at the time the plea was entered.
The right to counsel under the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Crusoe v. State
...a basis for the collateral relief sought, otherwise the motion is deficient. State v. Weeks, Fla.1964, 166 So.2d 892; Dias v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 766. This is not to say that such motion should be scrutinized for technical niceties, quite the reverse; 2 but at the same time, fact......
-
Armstrong v. State, 4591
...159 So.2d 921. Since the motion is plainly insufficient, the trial judge's order must be affirmed for the reasons stated in Dias v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 766, without prejudice as stated in Turner v. State, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d Affirmed. SMITH, C. J., and SHANNON and ANDREWS, JJ......
-
Brown v. State
...Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 383; Tolar v. State, Fla.App.1967, 196 So.2d 1; Grayson v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 587; Dias v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 766. Furthermore, assuming the contention as to the sentence was open to review, it is wholly unavailing to Brown here because it is ......
-
Roberts v. State
...any matters for which such relief could be granted. See and compare Stacey v. State, Fla.App.,App.1964, 165 So.2d 222; Dias v. State, Fla.App.,App.1963, 158 So.2d 766; Savage v. State, Fla.App., App.1963, 156 So.2d 566; Auflick v. State, Fla.App.,App.1963, 158 So.2d 767; King v. State, Fla.......