Dickey v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.

Citation370 So.2d 1234
Decision Date16 May 1979
Docket NumberNo. 78-911,78-911
PartiesMargaret Ann DICKEY, Appellant, v. GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)

Lee S. Damsker of Gordon & Maney, Tampa, for appellant.

H. Vance Smith of Macfarlane, Ferguson, Allison & Kelly, Tampa, for appellee.

BOARDMAN, Judge.

Appellant Margaret Ann Dickey appeals the final judgment entered in favor of appellee Grange Mutual Casualty Company.

Dickey was injured in an automobile accident while a passenger in a vehicle operated by Frances Ballard. At the time of the accident Frances Ballard had liability insurance in the amount of $10,000. Dickey held an uninsured motorist policy issued by Grange with a limit of $20,000. Dickey determined that her injuries were in excess of Ballard's liability coverage and brought an uninsured motorist claim against Grange. Grange participated in an arbitration proceeding with Dickey. The arbitration panel filed its amended award of arbitration which provided:

AS A RESULT OF THE NEGLIGENCE OF FRANCES BALLARD IN THE OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE IN WHICH MARGARET A. DICKEY WAS A PASSENGER, MARGARET A. DICKEY, SUSTAINED TOTAL DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND NO CENTS ($7,500.00), IN ADDITION TO PERSONAL INJURY PROTECTION BENEFITS PREVIOUSLY PAID BY GRANGE MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY.

Dickey filed a motion to confirm the arbitration award. Grange filed a motion to modify or vacate the award and an objection to the motion to confirm the arbitration award. At the hearing on these motions Dickey argued that the court should enter judgment against Grange for the entire amount of the arbitration award. Grange contended that since the amount of the arbitration award did not exceed the limits of Ballard's liability insurance Grange was not liable for any amount. The trial court ordered the arbitration award be modified to provide that "no portion of this award shall be payable" by Grange. It then confirmed the award as modified. This appeal was filed timely from that order.

Appellant, relying on Arrieta v. Volkswagen Ins. Co., 343 So.2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), argues that since she has a right to compel arbitration with her uninsured motorist carried prior to instituting an action against the tortfeasor she has a right to entry of judgment against her carrier based on the arbitration award. However, Arrieta does not provide authority for this position. The issue in Arrieta was whether the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Bruno v. Travelers Ins. Co., 79-1620
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 5, 1980
    ...that it is in excess of, and does not duplicate benefits available to the claimant from the tortfeasor. See Dickey v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co., 370 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). It has been held we think correctly that, under this provision, Bruno would have no right to recovery from Tra......
  • Kenilworth Ins. Co. v. Drake
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 10, 1981
    ...must be credited against UMC. Jones v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Rhode Island, 368 So.2d 1289 (Fla.1979); Dickey v. Grange Mutual, 370 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). In the instant case, however, the difficult question lies at the threshold: has there been a binding determination that appe......
  • Mayo v. CAPITAL ASSURANCE CO., INC., 3D02-2650.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 14, 2003
    ...and the insurer not liable in any event. See Bruno v. Travelers Ins. Co., 386 So.2d 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Dickey v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co., 370 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); see also Allstate Ins. Co. v. Silow, 714 So.2d 647 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Marko, 695......
  • Cartwright v. Allstate Ins. Co., 83-612
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 16, 1983
    ...387 So.2d 976 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Bruno v. Travelers Insurance Company, 386 So.2d 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Dickey v. Grange Mutual Casualty Company, 370 So.2d 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company v. Diem, 358 So.2d 39 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). However, we reverse the t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT