Dickson v. New York Biscuit Co.
Decision Date | 24 October 1904 |
Citation | 211 Ill. 468,71 N.E. 1058 |
Parties | DICKSON et al. v. NEW YORK BISCUIT CO. et al. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Circuit Court, Cook County; F. A. Smith, Judge.
Suit by Alice M. Dickson and another against the New York Biscuit Company and others. Decree for defendants, and complainants appeal. Affirmed.Bulkley, Gray & More, for appellants.
Pence & Carpenter, for appellees.
This is a bill filed in the circuit court of Cook county on June 12, 1902, by the appellants, children of Marietta C. Strong, deceased, and grandchildren of Philo Carpenter, praying that a certain deed executed by Theodore F. Bliss and Phineas L. Hanscom, as trustees under the will of Philo Carpenter, deceased, on September 18, 1890, and recorded October 27, 1890, to William Coffeen; and a deed dated September 18, 1890, and two deeds, dated respectively September 20, 1890, and November 5, 1890, by the same trustees to said Coffeen; and a deed dated and recorded on October 28, 1890, executed by William Coffeen to the New York Biscuit Company; and a mortgage deed dated March 1, 1891, and recorded on April 25, 1891, executed by the New York Biscuit Company to the Central Trust Company, a New York corporation, as trustee, to secure the New York Biscuit Company's 1,500 bonds of even date with the said mortgage for $1,000 each, payable on March 1, 1911, with interest at 6 per cent., etc.; and a deed dated January 29, 1898, and recorded November 20, 1902, executed by the New York Biscuit Company to one Robert F. Hall, subject to said mortgage or deed of trust; and a deed dated February 3, 1898, and recorded November 20, 1902, executed by said Hall to the National Biscuit Company, a New Jersey corporation-all conveying eight lots, to wit, lots from 22 to [211 Ill. 470]29, inclusive, in the resubdivision of block 41 in Carpenter's addition to Chicago-be decreed to be void for want of authority in said Bliss and Hanscom, as trustees under said will, to execute the same, and be set aside as clouds upon the title of the appellants, and that the latter be decreed to be vested with the title to said lots; or that the defendant the New York Biscuit Company or the defendant the National Biscuit Company be decreed to hold the legal title of said lots in trust for appellants under the trust created by the will of Philo Carpenter, and be compelled to convey the same to the appellants by good and sufficient deed free of all liens and incumbrances; and that defendants be decreed to surrender possession of said lots to the appellants.
The bill was answered by the New York Biscuit Company, William Coffeen, the Central Trust Company, and the National Biscuit Company, and to such answer replication was filed. The bill was amended, and the unknown holders of the 1,500 bonds above referred to were made defendants. Default was entered against the unknown owners and holders of said bonds. Upon final hearing the circuit court rendered a decree dismissing the bill and various amendments thereto and the supplements thereto for want of equity, at the cost of complainants below, the appellants here. The present appeal is prosecuted from the decree of dismissal so entered by the circuit court.
The facts, so far as it is necessary to state them in order to understand the questions involved, are substantially as follows:
On April 22, 1881, Philo Carpenter made his last will, the material portions of which, after providing for the payment of debts and funeral expenses, are as follows:
‘Second-(1) I give and bequeath all my personal estate of whatever kind or character and wherever the same may be situated, of which I may die possessed or be entitled to, one-third to Theodore F. Bliss and Phineas L. Hanscom, in trust, as hereinafter provided, also one-third to my daughter,Anna A. Cheney, her heirs and assigns forever, and one-third to my daughter, Sarah G. Hildreth, her heirs and assigns forever.
‘(7) I give, devise and bequeath one-quarter of all my real estate so divided, to my daughter, Anna A. Cheney, her heirs and assigns forever.
‘(8) I give, devise and bequeath one-quarter of all my real estate so divided, to my daughter, Sarah G. Hildreth, her heirs and assigns forever.
‘(9) I direct that the remaining one-fourth part or quarter of my said real estate, shall be used in aid of or for the support of educational, religious and charitable institutions or objects, and in aid of and for the benefit of relations or friends of my family or any or either of said objects.
‘(10) This trust to be executed by my said daughters from time to time and in whatever manner they shall see fit, using whatever part or parts of said remaining onequarter for whatever purpose or purposes above mentioned they shall in their own judgment and discretion see fit and deem best, bearing in mind by own well known preference.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Whitley v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.
......White, 68 Vt. 161, 34 A. 425;. Farwell v. Myers, 59 Mich. 179, 26 N.W. 328;. Dickson v. New York Biscuit Co., 211 Ill. 468, 71. N.E. 1059; In re Hildebrant, 120 F. 992; Barrell. ......
-
Gruenewald v. Neu
......Saeger v. Bode, supra; Dickson v. New York Biscuit Co., 211 Ill. 468, 71 N. E. 1058;Metzen v. Schopp, 202 Ill. 275, 67 N. E. 36, ......
-
Warford v. Mcqueen
......Dickson v. New York Biscuit Co., 211 Ill. 468, 71 N.E. 1058;Penn v. Heisey, 19 Ill. 295, 68 Am.Dec. ......
-
Daniels v. Brooks
...... Salvation Army organized under the laws of four different States, viz., under the laws of New York, Georgia, California and Illinois, and that each of these corporations, by reason of the ...Dickson v. New York Biscuit Co., 211 Ill. 468, 71 N.E. 1058. Nothing of the kind is alleged in the ......