Dictado v. Ducharme, 98-35531

Decision Date04 May 1999
Docket NumberNo. 98-35531,98-35531
Parties(9th Cir. 1999) FORTUNADO L. DICTADO, Petitioner-Appellant, v. KENNETH DUCHARME, Respondent-Appellee
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

To continue reading

Request your trial
37 cases
  • Bemore v. Chappell
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of California
    • September 19, 2012
  • Rouse v. Iowa
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa
    • July 28, 2000
    ...petition is not "properly filed" if the petition is dismissed as successive under the state's procedural rules. See Dictado v. Ducharme, 189 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir.1999). The Court reasoned that the policy of deferring to state courts weighs in favor of requiring prisoners to comply with th......
  • Jenkins v. Johnson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • May 20, 2003
    ...jurisdiction over Jenkins' petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 and 2254. Relying on this court's decision in Dictado v. Ducharme, 189 F.3d 889, 892 (9th Cir.1999) (Dictado I), the district court determined that the one-year statute of limitations imposed by AEDPA had not been tolled and ......
  • U.S. ex rel. Weston v. Clark
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • June 5, 2000
    ...for federal habeas corpus proceedings. U.S. ex. rel. Everett v. Neal, 65 F.Supp.2d 850 (N.D.Ill.1999). See also Dictado v. Ducharme, 189 F.3d 889, 890, 891 (9th Cir.1999) (to trigger tolling provision for "properly filed" application for collateral review, means to submit application in com......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT