Didocha v. State
| Decision Date | 21 October 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 54010,54010 |
| Citation | 54 A.D.2d 786,387 N.Y.S.2d 752 |
| Parties | David T. DIDOCHA as Administrator of the Estate of Martha Ann Didocha, Deceased, Appellant, v. STATE of New York, Respondent. Claim |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Greene, Hershdorfer & Sharpe, Syracuse (Hilbert I. Greene, Syracuse, of counsel), for appellant.
Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. (J. Lawson Brown, Albany, of counsel), for respondent.
Before KOREMAN, P.J., and GREENBLOTT, MAIN, LARKIN and HERLIHY, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment in favor of claimant, entered February 4, 1975, upon a decision of the Court of Claims.
On April 13, 1971, Martha Didocha, age 26, committed suicide while a voluntary patient at Willard State Hospital, leaving a husband and four children, the oldest being five years old. The Court of Claims determined that the State's negligence was the proximate cause of Martha's death and awarded claimant $15,726 of which $726 represents funeral expenses and $15,000 represents damages on the wrongful death claim. Only the claimant appeals and the sole issue before this court is whether the said award of damages was inadequate.
The record reveals that Martha had suffered from a mental condition since August, 1963 with 10 hospitalizations in seven years. Her suicidal tendencies were evidenced by the fact that she attempted to take her life on several occasions. The State presented two well qualified psychiatrists, both of whom testified that the possibility of her recovery from her mental problems and of her contributing to the overall well-being of her family unit was poor.
The basis of recovery in a wrongful death action is the pecuniary loss suffered by the persons for whose benefit the action is brought (9A Rohan, N.Y.Civ.Prac., EPTL, 5--4.3). Although the loss of care, love and guidance that a mother provides for her children is a proper element of pecuniary damages in a wrongful death action (George v. County of Erie, 66 Misc.2d 871, 322 N.Y.S.2d 278; see Zaninovich v. American Airlines, 26 A.D.2d 155, 271 N.Y.S.2d 866), and the chores and duties of a housewife are also to be considered (Karpinski v. State of New York, 35 A.D.2d 84, 312 N.Y.S.2d 929, affd. 28 N.Y.2d 834, 322 N.Y.S.2d 71, 270 N.E.2d 898), the pecuniary loss must be based upon the reasonable expectancy of future assistance or support which the beneficiaries would have had if their decedent's life had continued (Loetsch v. New York City Omnibus Corp., ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Romero v. Byers
...damages awarded to child for loss of instruction and training due to the death of her father upheld); Didocha v. State, 54 A.D.2d 786, 387 N.Y.S.2d 752, 753 (Sup.Ct.1976) (loss of care, love, and guidance is a proper element of pecuniary damages in a wrongful death case); Estate of Clifton ......
-
In re Joint Eastern & Southern Dist. Asbestos Lit.
...(1943); Gilliard v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 77 A.D.2d 532, 430 N.Y.S.2d 308 (1st Dep't 1980); Didocha v. State, 54 A.D.2d 786, 387 N.Y.S.2d 752 (3d Dep't 1976). E. Avoiding Double Because future earnings can, as already noted, be an element of damages in both personal inju......
-
Valicenti v. Valenze
...wrongful death actions, the courts have permitted some recovery on facts analogous to those of the instant case (Didocha v. State of New York, 54 A.D.2d 786, 387 N.Y.S.2d 752; Freeman v. Corbin Ave. Bus Co., 46 A.D.2d 747, 360 N.Y.S.2d 747). Given the loss by plaintiff and the children of t......
-
Estate of Feld, Matter of
...517 N.E.2d 872 (1987); Richardson v. Lutheran Hospital, 70 A.D.2d 933, 417 N.Y.S.2d 526 (2d Dept.1979); Didocha v. State of New York, 54 A.D.2d 786, 387 N.Y.S.2d 752 (3rd Dept.1976). Children who lose parents may recover damages not only during infancy but for those adult years when the par......