Dietrich v. Stebbins
Decision Date | 12 December 1896 |
Citation | 100 Iowa 426,69 N.W. 564 |
Parties | DIETRICH ET AL. v. STEBBINS ET AL. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from district court, Van Buren county; M. A. Roberts, Judge.
Action at law to recover the contract price of certain furniture manufactured and delivered to the defendants. Defense, that the furniture did not comply with the terms of the contract, and a counterclaim for damages. Verdict and judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal. Reversed.Wherry & Walker, for appellants.
Work & Brown, for appellees.
Plaintiffs are manufacturers of furniture and office fixtures, doing business in the city of Ottumwa. Some time during the fall of the year 1894, one T. A. Stebbins, a member of the defendant firm, which is engaged in the restaurant business at the town of Bonaparte, went to Ottumwa for the purpose of buying a back case, counter, drip boards, etc., with which to fit up their place of business. He proceeded to plaintiffs' office, and there found one Snook, who was foreman in plaintiffs' factory, but who, it appears, had no authority to make contracts with reference to any goods which had to be specially manufactured. Stebbins told Snook what he wanted, and together they visited different places in the city to inspect the character of plaintiffs' work, one of these being what is known as the “Ballingall Billiard Hall Annex.” Snook made a memorandum of Stebbins' wants, which he afterwards submitted to Mr. Dietrich, of the plaintiff firm, who, it seems, had charge of the matter of making estimates for such work as the defendants wanted. At the time he submitted the memorandum to Dietrich, Snook informed him that he had taken Stebbins to various places where the plaintiffs had furniture which had been manufactured by them. Stebbins returned to his home, and thereafter plaintiffs wrote him the following letter: On the same day defendants wrote plaintiffs the following: In response to plaintiffs' first letter, defendants wrote the following: To which the plaintiffs replied as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial