DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of New York, Inc.
| Citation | 614 N.Y.S.2d 114,204 A.D.2d 167 |
| Court | New York Supreme Court Appellate Division |
| Decision Date | 17 May 1994 |
| Parties | Joseph P. DiIORIO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GIBSON & CUSHMAN OF NEW YORK, INC., et al., Defendants. Robert P. HERZOG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Kenneth HELLER, Respondent-Respondent. |
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on or about March 5, 1993, which granted attorney Heller's motion to confirm the Special Referee's report and denied attorney Herzog's cross motion to reject the report, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The Referee's findings were based upon a proper consideration of the factors used in determining the reasonableness of an attorney's claim for services (see, Matter of Karp, 145 A.D.2d 208, 215, 537 N.Y.S.2d 510, citing Matter of Freeman, 34 N.Y.2d 1, 9, 355 N.Y.S.2d 336, 311 N.E.2d 480), and substantially supported by the record (see, United States Trust Co. v. Olsen, 194 A.D.2d 481, 482, 599 N.Y.S.2d 571).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kaplan v. Einy
...referee shall be confirmed whenever the findings contained therein are substantially supported by the record (DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of N.Y., 204 A.D.2d 167, 614 N.Y.S.2d 114; United States Trust Co. v. Olsen, 194 A.D.2d 481, 482, 599 N.Y.S.2d 571) and the referee has clearly defined t......
-
Yahudaii v. Baroukhian
...them before the JHO ( see Marcano v. U–Haul Co. of Va., 82 A.D.3d 479, 918 N.Y.S.2d 340 [2011]; DiIorio v. Gibson & Cushman of N.Y., 204 A.D.2d 167, 614 N.Y.S.2d 114 [1994] ). Similarly, at the inquest, defendant failed to raise the claim that he was misled as to what was scheduled to take ......
-
People v. Cambria
......204 A.D.2d 167. The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,. v. Frank CAMBRIA, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. ......
-
People v. Woodside
......204 A.D.2d 168. The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,. v. Barry WOODSIDE, Defendant-Appellant. ......