Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc. v. Hall
| Decision Date | 07 July 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 95-0548,95-0548 |
| Citation | 909 S.W.2d 491 |
| Parties | 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1042 DILLARD DEPARTMENT STORES, INC., Mr. K.D. Skelton and Mr. Donald Golding, Relators, v. The Honorable Richard HALL, Judge, Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Brock C. Akers, Houston, Evelyn T. Ailts, Houston and Kevin G. Corcoran, Houston, for relators.
Lester R. Buzbee, III, Conroe, for respondent.
Albert Parker sued Dillard and two of its employees alleging they subjected him to false arrest and inflicted personal injury when they detained him while shopping at a Dillard store in Houston, Texas. In January 1994, Parker filed his second request for the production of documents, including:
Copies of all complaints, including lawsuits filed against Defendant, which involve an alleged wrongful detention, arrest, civil rights violation, or any other complaint similar to the complaint of Plaintiff. If there are numerous lawsuits, you may produce the names of the court, case numbers and plaintiffs' names, and attorneys' names and addresses.
Dillard objected that the request was overly broad, burdensome, and not reasonably calculated to lead to relevant evidence. It supported the objections with affidavit evidence that Dillard has 227 stores in twenty states, of which sixty are located in Texas and eight in Houston. Parker filed a motion to compel production but before the matter could be heard, he agreed to accept production of documents concerning substantially similar claims in Harris County for two years prior to the incident. Dillard produced those documents.
In September 1994, Parker filed his third request for documents from Dillard, seeking a computer report and the incident reports and claims files for 668 named customers who had filed false arrest claims from stores across the country during the years 1984 through 1992. Dillard again objected that the request was overly broad, burdensome, and not calculated to lead to relevant evidence. Parker filed a motion to compel compliance with his second and third requests for production of documents.
The trial court ordered Dillard to produce every claims file and incident report prepared from 1985 through 1990 in every lawsuit or claim that involved allegations of false arrest, civil rights violations, and excessive use of force. It also ordered production of a computer-generated listing of these claims. Parker states in his response to Dillard's motions in this court that he...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re W. Dairy Transp.
...of discovery is largely within the trial court’s discretion. In re Colonial Pipeline Co. , 968 S.W.2d at 941 ; Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc. v. Hall , 909 S.W.2d 491, 492 (Tex. 1995). A trial court abuses its discretion when it acts in an unreasonable or arbitrary manner or, stated differently......
-
In re Aiu Ins. Co.
...In re Colonial Pipeline Co., 968 S.W.2d at 942-43; K Mart Corp. v. Sanderson, 937 S.W.2d 429, 431 (Tex.1996); Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Hall, 909 S.W.2d 491, 492 (Tex.1995); Texaco, Inc. v. Sanderson, 898 S.W.2d 813, 815 49. See Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 843 (concluding that mandamus relief......
-
In re Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co.
...Procedure and substantial case law) to flexibly determine what is discoverable in civil litigation. See Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc. v. Hall , 909 S.W.2d 491, 492 (Tex. 1995) (per curiam) ("The scope of discovery is largely within the discretion of the trial court."). "Only in certain narrow ......
-
In re Jacobs
...fishing expedition. K Mart Corp. v. Sanderson, 937 S.W.2d 429, 431 (Tex.1996) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Hall, 909 S.W.2d 491, 492 (Tex. 1995) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam); Texaco, Inc., 898 S.W.2d at The scope of discovery is a matter of trial-court d......
-
Discovery
...Optical Corp. 988 S.W.2d 711 (Tex. 1998); K-mart v. Sanderson, 937 S.W.2d 429 (Tex. 1996) (per curium); Dillard Dep’t Stores v. Hall , 909 S.W.2d 491 (Tex. 1995) (per curium); Texaco, Inc. v. Sanderson 898 S.W.2d 813 (Tex. 1995); Loftin v. Martin , 776 S.W.2d 145, 148 (Tex. 1989)); In re CS......
-
Notices for Production
...interrogatories, requests for document production may not be used for exploration or fishing expeditions. Dillard Dep’t Stores v. Hall , 909 S.W.2d 491, 38 Tex.Sup.Ct.J. 1042 (Tex. 1995). See also infra , §14.33, Demonstrative Evidence. 19 See Resolution Trust Corp. v. Deloitte & Touche, 14......
-
Discovery
...Optical Corp. 988 S.W.2d 711 (Tex. 1998); K-mart v. Sanderson, 937 S.W.2d 429 (Tex. 1996) (per curium); Dillard Dep’t Stores v. Hall , 909 S.W.2d 491 (Tex. 1995) (per curium); Texaco, Inc. v. Sanderson 898 S.W.2d 813 (Tex. 1995); Loftin v. Martin , 776 S.W.2d 145, 148 (Tex. 1989)); In re CS......
-
CHAPTER 6 Petitions for Writ of Mandamus
...(orig. proceeding); Texaco, Inc. v. Sanderson, 898 S.W.2d 813, 815 (Tex. 1995) (orig. proceeding); Dillard Dep't Stores, Inc. v. Hall, 909 S.W.2d 491, 492 (Tex. 1995) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 843 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding); Gen. Motors Corp. v. Lawrence, 651......