Dimmick v. People of State

CourtIllinois Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtDICKEY
CitationDimmick v. People of State , 87 Ill. 96, 1877 WL 9812 (Ill. 1877)
Decision Date30 September 1877
PartiesJOHN GARRISON alias John Dimmickv.THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

WRIT OF ERROR to the Circuit Court of DuPage county; the Hon. H. H. CODY, Judge, presiding.

Mr. H. F. VALLETTE, for the plaintiff in error.

Mr. JUSTICE DICKEY delivered the opinion of the Court:

Plaintiff in error was convicted of larceny upon the second count of an indictment; the other counts were quashed by the court before trial. A motion to quash the second count was made before plea, and overruled, and this is assigned as error. That count charges the larceny to have been committed on January 21, 1866. The indictment was found at September term, 1876. The statute of limitations in force in 1866, provided that no person should be prosecuted or tried for larceny, “unless the indictment for the same shall be found by a grand jury within three years next after the offense shall have been done or committed, provided that nothing herein contained shall extend to any person fleeing from justice.” This indictment, upon its face, shows it was not found until more than three years after the alleged commission of the offense, and this count does not contain a charge that the accused had, at any time, been a “person fleeing from justice.” Under that statute the count is clearly bad, and ought to have been quashed, unless that statute be rendered inoperative by subsequent legislation. In the ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
17 cases
  • People v. Lutter
    • United States
    • Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 18, 2015
    ...court distinguished between bad indictments, which are subject to being quashed, and good indictments, which are not. In Garrison v. People, 87 Ill. 96, 97 (1877), our supreme court stated that an indictment that showed on its face that the offense was committed outside of the statute of li......
  • State v. Hayward
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • November 20, 1895
    ... ... Hoberg v. State, 3 Minn. 181, (262); Shaffner v ... Com., 72 Pa. 60; State v. Lapage, 57 N.H. 245; ... People v. Corbin, 56 N.Y. 363; Coleman v ... People, 55 N.Y. 81; Snyder v. Com., 85 Pa. 519; ... Barton v. State, 18 Oh. 221; Coble v ... ...
  • Wilson v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • October 18, 1938
    ...176 Ill. 590, 52 N.E. 372. If the date stated is beyond the statute of limitations, the indictment is bad and will be quashed. Garrison v. People, 87 Ill. 96; Lamkin People, 94 Ill. 501. If the offense is laid on an uncertain or impossible day, or on a future day, the objection is fatal, ev......
  • State v. Steensland
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • March 1, 1921
    ...Robinson, 29 N.H. 274; McLane v. State, 4 Ga. 335; State v. Ball, 30 W.Va. 382, 4 S.E. 645; State v. Rust, 8 Blackf. (Ind.) 195; Garrison v. State, 87 Ill. 96; Lamkin State, 94 Ill. 501; People v. Hallberg, 259 Ill. 502, 102 N.E. 1005; White v. State, 4 Tex. Ct. App. 488; State v. Shaw, 113......
  • Get Started for Free