Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish, 98-1758
| Decision Date | 24 March 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 98-1758,98-1758 |
| Citation | 85 Ohio St.3d 168,707 N.E.2d 851 |
| Parties | OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. FISH. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
Jonathan E. Coughlan, Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.
Edward G. Marks, for respondent.
We adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson, 2006-1197.
...respondent's billing practices on a par with the irregularities for which we publicly reprimanded lawyers in Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish (1999), 85 Ohio St.3d 168, 707 N.E.2d 851, and Columbus Bar Assn. v. Mills, 109 Ohio St.3d 245, 2006-Ohio-2290, 846 N.E.2d III. Review {¶ 33} Both partie......
-
Kentucky Bar Ass'n v. Fish, 99-SC-0689-KB.
...respondent, Baruch David Fish, was publicly disciplined in Ohio for charging a clearly excessive fee. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Fish, 85 Ohio St.3d 168, 707 N.E.2d 851 (1999). Upon motion by the Kentucky Bar Association, this Court issued a show cause order to show cause, if any, wh......