Ditmid Holdings, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, Nat'l Ass'n

Decision Date26 February 2020
Docket NumberIndex No. 510467/14,2017-02354
Parties DITMID HOLDINGS, LLC, Respondent, v. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

180 A.D.3d 1002
120 N.Y.S.3d 393

DITMID HOLDINGS, LLC, Respondent,
v.
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., Appellant.

2017-02354
Index No. 510467/14

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Argued - November 7, 2019
February 26, 2020


McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, LLC, New Rochelle, N.Y. (Edward Rugino of counsel), for appellant.

Berg & David, PLLC, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Stefanie Murphy–Boykins and Abraham David of counsel), for respondent.

JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, JEFFREY A. COHEN, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

180 A.D.3d 1002

In an action pursuant to RPAPL 1501(4) to cancel and discharge of record a mortgage, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Genine

120 N.Y.S.3d 394

D. Edwards, J.), dated January 26, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

On April 28, 2006, nonparty Abderrahim Salaii executed a note and gave a mortgage on certain real property located in Brooklyn in exchange for a loan. The note provided for repayment of the loan in monthly installments, and the mortgage included a provision authorizing the lender to accelerate the full amount due upon the borrower's default in payment and notice by the lender. On January 15, 2008, the mortgage was assigned to nonparty Washington Mutual Bank (hereinafter WAMU), which commenced an action to foreclose the mortgage on or about February 20, 2008 (hereinafter the WAMU foreclosure action). The complaint alleged that Salaii had defaulted in payment and stated that WAMU was electing to call due the entire amount secured by the mortgage.

While the WAMU foreclosure action was pending, the mortgage was assigned to JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association (hereinafter JPMorgan). JPMorgan commenced a second action to foreclose the mortgage on December 8, 2009 (hereinafter the JPMorgan foreclosure action). In July 2013, Salaii conveyed the subject property to the plaintiff. In an order dated November 21, 2013, the Supreme Court directed dismissal of the complaint in the WAMU foreclosure action as abandoned pursuant to CPLR 3215(c). In an order dated

180 A.D.3d 1003

December 3, 2013, the court directed dismissal of the JPMorgan foreclosure action, without...

To continue reading

Request your trial
53 cases
  • Oakdale III, LLC v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 Diciembre 2020
    ...(see Daldan, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co., 188 A.D.3d 989, 2020 WL 6750817 ; Ditmid Holdings, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 180 A.D.3d 1002, 1003, 120 N.Y.S.3d 393 ). In opposition to the motion and in support of its cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint in......
  • 1042 II Realty, Inc. v. PHH Mortg. Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 31 Enero 2022
    ...the entire amount is due and the Statute of Limitations begins to run on the entire debt." Ditmid Holdings, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. , 180 A.D.3d 1002, 1003, 120 N.Y.S.3d 393 (2020) ; see also Freedom Mortg. Corp. v. Engel , 37 N.Y.3d 1, 21, 146 N.Y.S.3d 542, 169 N.E.3d 912 (2021) r......
  • Daldan, Inc. v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 18 Noviembre 2020
    ...of limitations for commencing a foreclosure action has expired (see RPAPL 1501[4] ; Ditmid Holdings, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 180 A.D.3d 1002, 1003, 120 N.Y.S.3d 393 ; Milone v. U.S. Bank N.A., 164 A.D.3d 145, 151, 83 N.Y.S.3d 524 ). An action to foreclose a mortgage is subject to ......
  • DK Gates Homes, LLC v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 12 Noviembre 2020
    ...the time the action to cancel and discharge of record the mortgage was commenced (see Ditmid Holdings, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 180 A.D.3d 1002, 1003, 120 N.Y.S.3d 393 ; Prand Corp. v. Gardiner, 176 A.D.3d 1127, 1129, 111 N.Y.S.3d 393 ; Halfon v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 169 A.D.3d 653, 65......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT