Dixie Auto Transport Co., Inc. v. Louttit, 90-03667

Decision Date01 November 1991
Docket NumberNo. 90-03667,90-03667
PartiesDIXIE AUTO TRANSPORT COMPANY, INC. and Wendol D. Phelps, Appellants, v. Clyde Avon LOUTTIT, Appellee. 588 So.2d 68, 16 Fla. L. Week. D2775
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Appeal from nonfinal order of the Circuit Court for Polk County; Joe E. Young, Jr., Judge.

Shelley H. Leinicke, Wicker, Smith, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, Fort Lauderdale, for appellants.

Charles T. Canady and Donald G. Jacobsen, Lane, Trohn, Clarke, Bertrand & Williams, P.A., Lakeland, for appellee.

HALL, Judge.

The appellants contend the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the appellee on the basis of collateral estoppel. The appellants argue the defensive use of collateral estoppel is inappropriate where there is no mutuality of parties. We disagree and affirm based on Zeidwig v. Ward, 548 So.2d 209 (Fla.1989), and Verhagen v. Arroyo, 552 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

RYDER, A.C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • 5F, LLC v. Dresing
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 16 Julio 2014
    ...annex. An exception to the mutuality of parties requirement was also applied in the three-line opinion in Dixie Auto Transport Co., Inc. v. Louttit, 588 So.2d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). However, in recognizing the exception, this court cited Zeidwig and a Third District case, Verhagen v. Arroyo......
  • United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Selz
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 25 Mayo 1994
    ...arisen at the appellate level following summary final judgment. Zeidwig v. Ward, 548 So.2d 209 (Fla.1989); Dixie Auto Transp. Co. v. Louttit, 588 So.2d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Hochstadt v. Orange Broadcast, 588 So.2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Verhagen v. Arroyo, 552 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989......
  • Lee v. Gadasa Corp., 96-476
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 11 Octubre 1996
    ...not required for the doctrine to apply, relying on Verhagen v. Arroyo, 552 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), and Dixie Auto Transport Co. v. Louttit, 588 So.2d 68 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), as authority for that proposition. More recent case law convinces us that the trial court's interpretation of t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT