Dixie-Bell Oil Co., Inc. v. Gold, DIXIE-BELL
| Decision Date | 20 March 1973 |
| Docket Number | DIXIE-BELL,No. 72-696,72-696 |
| Parties | OIL COMPANY, INC., a Florida corporation, et al., Appellants, v. Milton S. GOLD, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Joel R. Teague, Coral Gables, and Don Lacy, Miami, for appellants.
Nachwalter & Falk, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HAVERFIELD, JJ.
Defendant-appellant seeks review of a final judgment entered upon a $15,000 jury verdict for plaintiff.
Plaintiff sustained injuries when he became involved in an automobile accident with a vehicle owned by defendant Dixie-Bell Oil Company. Defendant admitted liability and the case was tried before a jury as to the issue of damages. At trial, attorney for the defendant offered to introduce into evidence a letter from plaintiff's attorney advising the examining doctor to destroy or hide certain enclosed medical reports on plaintiff after reviewing them. During the proceedings, plaintiff denied the filing of any workman's compensation claims. In his argument to the jury, defendant's attorney indicated that information from the Workman's Compensation Bureau reflected a claim had been filed but after a certain period of time the records had been destroyed and, therefore, were not available. Plaintiff's counsel, in his closing, answered that it was unbelievable that opposing counsel would have the gall to state that the Bureau of Workman's Compensation destroys records. At the conclusion of the trial, the court instructed the jury that only testimony that comes from the witness stand shall be considered evidence. The jury returned a $15,000 verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant moved for a new trial which was denied. This appeal ensued.
Appellant raises on appeal the point that plaintiff's attorney's letter should have been introduced into evidence and for authority relies upon Seaboard AirLine Railroad v. Strickland, Fla.1956, 88 So.2d 519. However, in Strickland, the correspondence contained an expression of amusement over the diagnosis of plaintiff's condition by defendant's lawyer and physician. The case sub judice is clearly distinguishable as the letter here involves only the inclusion of the reports of examining doctors.
The trial court found that the letter was not relevant and material. We agree. The latter per se had no bearing on plaintiff's medical condition and there was no reason why the examining doctor could not read the reports enclosed therein. The ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Murphy v. International Robotic Systems, Inc.
...See, e.g., Wackenhut Corp. v. Canty, 359 So.2d 430 (Fla.1978); Tate v. Gray, 292 So.2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Dixie-Bell Oil Co. v. Gold, 275 So.2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). However, since in today's decision we hold that the issue of punitive damages was improperly submitted to the jury, it ......
-
Del Monte Banana Co. v. Chacon
...Insurance Co. v. Guthrie, 321 So.2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Tate v. Gray, 292 So.2d 618 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Dixie-Bell Oil Co. v. Gold, 275 So.2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). Since there is no appearance of prejudice or improper motive in the writing of "don't know" on the blackboard, the trial c......
-
B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Reeber
...84 (Fla.1975); Gallub v. Del Vecchio, 301 So.2d 785 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), cert. denied, 314 So.2d 774 (Fla.1975); Dixie-Bell Oil Co., Inc. v. Gold, 275 So.2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Garcia v. Lujando, 253 So.2d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Speight v. Dulimba, 208 So.2d 833 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968); Gener......
-
Zamora v. State, 77-2566
...that would not have tended to prove or disprove insanity was properly excluded, as being irrelevant. Dixie-Bell Oil Company, Inc. v. Gold, 275 So.2d 19 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). As Dr. Thomas' testimony was not relevant as to the issue of insanity, it was properly Appellant has additionally argue......