Dixon v. Express Equity Lending Grp., LLLP
Decision Date | 05 June 2013 |
Docket Number | No. 4D12–1381.,4D12–1381. |
Citation | 125 So.3d 965 |
Parties | Lavern DIXON, Appellant, v. EXPRESS EQUITY LENDING GROUP, LLLP, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Peter Ticktin, Josh Bleil and Kendrick Almaguer of The Ticktin Law Group, P.A., Deerfield Beach, for appellant.
No appearance filed for appellee.
A homeowner appeals a Final Judgment of Foreclosure.She argues the trial court erred in entering the final judgment because the special indorsement on the note refers to a non-party to the foreclosure proceedings.We agree and reverse.
The homeowner moved to dismiss the Complaint, and then before a ruling on the motion, answered asserting affirmative defenses.The case proceeded to a bench trial.At trial, the lender produced the original note.The note promised “to pay to the order of EXPRESS EQUITY LENDING GROUP, LLLP, ITS SUCCESSORS AND OR ASSIGNS AS THEIR INTERESTS MAY APPEAR.”The following language appeared on the back of the original note:
EXPRESS EQUITY LENDING GROUP, LLLP.
During the bench trial, the lender's counsel elicited the following testimony from the lender's president:
On redirect examination, the president offered the following testimony as to the lender's standing to foreclose on the mortgage:
The trial court entered a Final Judgment of Foreclosure in favor of the lender.The homeowner now appeals.
The homeowner argues that the trial court erred in entering a final judgment of foreclosure because the lender did not own or hold the note.The lender did not file an answer brief.
We have de novo review of whether a party has standing to bring an action.Westport Recovery Corp. v. Midas,954 So.2d 750, 752(Fla. 4th DCA2007).
Section 673.2051(1), Florida Statutes(2009), provides, in pertinent part:
If an indorsement is made by the holder of an instrument, whether payable to an identified person or payable to bearer, and the indorsement identifies a person to whom it makes the instrument payable, it is a “special indorsement.”When specially indorsed, an...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Phan v. Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co., 2D14–3364.
...for further proceedings, finding that the note endorsed in blank conveyed standing to Wells Fargo); Dixon v. Express Equity Lending Grp., 125 So.3d 965, 967–68 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (reversing a final judgment of foreclosure where the holder of the note was a third party and not the plaintiff......
-
Peters v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, Case No. 2D15-2222.
...1121, 1122–23 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) ; Home Outlet, 194 So.3d at 1078 ; Gonzalez 180 So.3d at 1108–09 ; Dixon v. Express Equity Lending Grp., LLLP, 125 So.3d 965, 967–68 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).IV. CONCLUSIONWe have considered the Bank's other arguments about standing, and we find them to be withou......
-
Gorel v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 5D13–3272.
...the special indorsement established that Chase had standing to bring the foreclosure action. See Dixon v. Express Equity Lending Grp., LLLP, 125 So.3d 965, 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (holding that bank who filed foreclosure complaint did not have standing to foreclose when original note contai......
-
Elman v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
...exhibit 3 proved EMC was the investor and the bank had no standing to foreclose.We have de novo review. Dixon v. Express Equity Lending Grp., LLLP, 125 So.3d 965, 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)."[S]tanding may be established from the plaintiff's status as the note holder, regardless of any recorde......