DL Peoples Group, Inc. v. Hawley, 1D01-0053.
Decision Date | 18 January 2002 |
Docket Number | No. 1D01-0053.,1D01-0053. |
Citation | 804 So.2d 561 |
Parties | D.L. PEOPLES GROUP, INC., Appellant, v. Donald HAWLEY, Deceased, and Zenith Insurance Company, Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Joseph E. Culmer, of Johnson & Baughan, P.A., Rockledge, for Appellant.
John E. McLain, III, of Rissman, Weisberg, Barrett, Hurt, Donahue & McLain, P.A., Orlando, for Appellees.
D.L. Peoples Group (Appellant) appeals the Judge of Compensation Claims' (JCC) order holding that the accident that caused the death of Appellee Donald Hawley (Hawley) is not compensable in Florida, because Hawley's employment agreement is based on a unilateral contract that could be formed solely by Hawley's performance in Missouri. Appellant argues Hawley's claim is compensable under Florida law, because such agreement is a bilateral contract executed in Florida, where the last necessary signature to complete the contract was obtained. Appellees argue the agreement was a unilateral contract and the JCC's ruling was correct. We agree with Appellant and reverse.
As stipulated by the parties, the relevant facts are that Appellant's representative interviewed Hawley in Missouri. Hawley never came to Florida. He responded to an ad in a Missouri newspaper designed to recruit Admissions Representatives to recruit Missouri residents to attend Appellant's college in Florida. Hawley's job was to recruit Missouri residents situated in Missouri. The representative recommended Hawley be approved, and an Admissions Representative Agreement (agreement) was mailed to Hawley. Hawley signed the agreement on November 16, 1996, in Missouri. The agreement was subsequently mailed to Appellant's President, for the "final say," and he executed the agreement on December 2, 1996, in his office in Kissimmee, Florida. Hawley was then trained exclusively in Missouri. Tragically, Hawley was shot and killed in Missouri while attempting to make one of his first calls.
The agreement provided Appellant was to pay Hawley a commission if Hawley successfully recruited students for Appellant's school; to provide Hawley with an opportunity to participate in Appellant's health and life insurance plans; and to provide appropriate payroll taxes for social security, unemployment and workers' compensation. Hawley agreed, among other things, to devote exclusive time and effort to Appellant's business; to operate in the territory assigned by Appellant; to maintain a certain level of liability and property damage insurance; to maintain certain licenses and levels of expertise in applicable areas; and to attend and complete Appellant's training program.
These mutual responsibilities constitute a bilateral contract. To form a bilateral contract, there must be mutuality of obligation. See McIntosh v. Harbour Club Villas Condominium, 468 So.2d 1075, 1076 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); see also Baiter v. Pan American Bank of Hialeah, 383 So.2d 256, 257 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) ( ); Mark Realty, Inc. v. Rogness, 418 So.2d 373, 376 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) ( ). Here, Hawley and Appellant clearly made mutual promises. Thus, the agreement is a bilateral contract, and Chapter 440 must be examined to determine the resulting consequences.
Section 440.09(1)(d), Florida Statutes (1999), provides in pertinent part, that:
[I]f an accident happens while the employee is employed elsewhere than in this state, which would entitle the employee or his or her dependents to compensation if it had happened in this state, the employee or his or her dependents are entitled to compensation if the contract of employment was made in this state, or the employment was principally localized in this state.
§ 440.09(1)(d), Fla. Stat. (emphasis added)....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Armor Corr. Health Servs. v. Teal
... ARMOR CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, v. BRUCE TEAL, Defendant. No. ... Fla. Feb. 16, 2016) (quoting D.L. Peoples Grp., Inc. v. Hawley, 804 So.2d 561, 563 (Fla. 1st ... . Teal has “multiple group phone calls”. with representatives from ......
-
GE Med. Sys. S.C.S. v. SYMX Healthcare Corp.
...party signs the contract, and the other party accepts and signs the contract, a binding contract results." D.L. Peoples Group, Inc. v. Hawley, 804 So. 2d 561, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (citing Skinner v. Haugseth, 426 So. 2d 1127, 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)); see also Mandell v. Fortenberry, 290......
-
Salaka v. Live Music Tutor, Inc.
...party signs the contract, and the other party accepts and signs the contract, a binding contract results." D.L. Peoples Grp., Inc. v. Hawley, 804 So. 2d 561, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). The difficulty here is that there is no evidence of a contract signed by either party. The document claims t......
-
Rocky Creek Retirement v. Estate of Fox
...party signs the contract, and the other party accepts and signs the contract, a binding contract results." D.L. Peoples Group, Inc. v. Hawley, 804 So.2d 561, 563 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (citing Skinner v. Haugseth, 426 So.2d 1127, 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)); see also Mandell v. Fortenberry, 290 S......