Dodosh v. County of Orange

Decision Date24 December 1981
Citation127 Cal.App.3d 936,179 Cal.Rptr. 804
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
PartiesPeter J. DODOSH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, et al., Defendants and Respondents. Civ. 24569.

David Graf, Seth J. Kelsey, and Banks, Leviton, Kelley, Drass & Kelsey, Inc., Santa Ana, for plaintiff and appellant.

Adrian Kuyper, County Counsel, and Donald H. Rubin, Deputy County Counsel, Santa Ana, for defendants and respondents.

LEVITT, Associate Justice. *

Peter J. Dodosh became employed by the County of Orange as a deputy sheriff on February 9, 1979. During the course of his employment he was a member of the Orange County Employees Retirement System. Dodosh took a two-month leave of absence due to an injury Dodosh claimed occurred in the course and scope of his employment. Dodosh's physician notified the county Dodosh could return to work, subject to certain work limitations for the first six weeks after returning. Dodosh, however, voluntarily resigned effective July 19, 1979, stating, in writing, he had accepted employment elsewhere which required his leaving the Orange County area August 3, 1979. He then, on July 20, 1979, applied for and received from the Retirement System, a refund of all monetary contributions he had made to it. Dodosh sought a disability retirement allowance by signing and submitting an application form on or about July 10, 1980. The Board of Retirement of the Retirement System determined Dodosh was not eligible to apply for a disability retirement and took no action on his application. Dodosh filed a petition for writ of mandate, which was denied by the trial court and now appeals.

The sole issue for us to decide is whether Dodosh was eligible to apply for a disability retirement. 1

Only a member of the Retirement System may apply for a disability retirement. (GOV.CODE S 31720. )2 The Orange County Employees Retirement System operates pursuant to sections 31450-31898 and the statutory provisions relating to disability retirement are contained in sections 31720-31740. These sections refer to "members."

Section 31470 defines "member" as "... any person included in the membership of the retirement association ... or any person who has elected in writing to come within the provisions of Article 9." Article 9 (§ 31700-31706) sets forth provisions wherein an employee who leaves county service and elects to leave accumulated contributions on deposit may receive a deferred retirement allowance and thereby remain a member of the Retirement System. Dodosh's voluntary resignation and withdrawal of retirement contributions thus precluded him from being a "member" when he applied for a disability retirement allowance.

Dodosh claims, however, that he was eligible to apply even though no longer a "member" because of section 31722 which provides:

"The application shall be made while the member is in service, within four months after his discontinuance of service, or while from the date of discontinuance of service to the time of the application he is continuously physically or mentally incapacitated to perform his duties."

Dodosh argues the last portion relating to "discontinued service" applies to him as...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Hittle v. Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement Assn.
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 5 August 1985
    ...if he or she is a member of the county employees' retirement association (see Gov.Code, § 31720 et seq.; Dodosh v. County of Orange (1981) 127 Cal.App.3d 936, 179 Cal.Rptr. 804), we conclude that the termination of such membership by the withdrawal of retirement contributions can be enforce......
  • Cameron v. Sacramento Cnty. Employees' Ret. Sys.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 2 November 2016
    ...Weissman's analysis regarding that term is directly on point and we adopt it here.Plaintiff relies on Dodosh v. County of Orange (1981) 127 Cal.App.3d 936, 179 Cal.Rptr. 804, a case that predated Weissman, to argue that his “service” for purposes of section 31722 continued as long as plaint......
  • San Diego Retirement Ass'n v. San Diego
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 7 June 2007
    ...leaves county employment and withdraws his or her contributions, the employee's membership terminates. (Dodosh v. County of Orange (1981) 127 Cal.App.3d 936, 938, 179 Cal.Rptr. 804.) If reemployed by the county, a former member may redeposit withdrawn retirement contributions with interest ......
  • Weissman v. Los Angeles County Employees Retirement Assn.
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 22 May 1989
    ...the purview of the second circumstance. In arguing against this conclusion, the Board relies solely on Dodosh v. County of Orange (1981) 127 Cal.App.3d 936, 179 Cal.Rptr. 804. In Dodosh, the plaintiff commenced work as a deputy sheriff for the County of Orange on February 9, 1979, whereupon......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT