Dodson v. Matthews
Decision Date | 22 December 1937 |
Parties | DODSON v. MATTHEWS. |
Court | Tennessee Court of Appeals |
Certiorari Denied by Supreme Court June 11, 1938.
Appeal from Part 1 Chancery Court, Davidson County; R. B. C. Howell Chancellor.
Suit by W. D. Dodson, administrator of the estate of Dr. G. B. Poole against Mrs. Effie Poole Matthews to determine title to certain bonds, wherein a cross-bill was filed. From an adverse decree, complainant appeals.
Reversed and rendered.
W. M Fuqua, of Nashville, for appellant.
Cornelius McKinney & Gilbert, of Nashville, for appellee.
The record in this case presents a controversy between the duly appointed and qualified administrator of the estate of Dr. G. B. Poole, deceased, on the one hand, and Mrs. Effie Poole Matthews, a sister of the deceased Dr. Poole, on the other hand, with respect to the ownership of seven 4 1/4 United States Liberty Loan Bonds of the aggregate par value of $7,000. The decree below was adverse to the administrator and he appealed to this Court and has assigned errors here.
Dr. G. B. Poole, a practicing physician, died intestate at his usual place of residence (the "Maxwell House") in Davidson County, Tennessee, on January 3, 1936, and left surviving him, as his next of kin and heirs at law, two sisters and two nieces. The two sisters were Mrs. Effie Poole Matthews, residing at Mr. Carmel (P. O. Sellers) in Montgomery County, Alabama, and Mrs. Daisy Poole McKenzie, residing at Selma, Alabama. The two nieces were Mrs. Virginia Poole Miller, residing at Greeneville, Alabama and Mrs. Martha Poole Lloyd, residing at Greeneville, Texas.
On January 6, 1936, the County Court of Davidson County, Tennessee, appointed W. D. Dodson, a practicing lawyer and a resident citizen of the city of Nashville, as administrator of the estate of said decedent, Dr. G. B. Poole, and said Dodson qualified as such administrator, and thereafter, on April 23, 1936, filed the original bill in this case, in Part One of the Chancery Court of Davidson County, against Mrs. Effie Poole Matthews (then temporarily in Davidson County, Tennessee), alleging, in substance, that he then had in his possession the aforesaid seven United States Liberty Loan bonds; that, in taking possession of the personal property of his decedent, Dr. Poole, he found said bonds, along with other valuable securities, currency and jewelry in a lock box rented and controlled by Dr. Poole in a Nashville Bank before and at the time of his death; that the defendant Mrs. Effie Poole Matthews had made demand upon complainant to turn over said seven United States Liberty Bonds to her, as her property, claiming that the estate of complainant's decedent has no interest therein, and that she, the defendant, is the owner thereof and entitled to same; but that complainant is advised, and so alleges, that defendant never at any time owned said bonds nor had any interest therein, except as one of the distributees in the administration of said estate of her deceased brother, Dr. Poole, and is not entitled to the possession of said bonds.
Complainant prayed that the Court adjudge and decree that the defendant is not the owner of nor entitled to possession of the seven $1,000 bonds in controversy, but that they are the property of the estate of Dr. G. B. Poole, deceased, to be distributed equally among the next of kin of complainant's intestate.
Defendant answered complainant's bill and alleged that "a completed and irrevocable gift of said bonds was made by complainant's intestate, Dr. G. B. Poole, to this defendant in November, 1930", and that since that time, until his death, Dr. Poole held said bonds as the agent of defendant, and that defendant is entitled to the possession of said bonds as the true owner thereof.
Defendant filed her answer as a cross-bill and prayed that she be decreed the title to and possession of the seven $1,000 United States Liberty Loan Bonds found in the safety deposit box of Dr. G. B. Poole, deceased, as aforesaid, and that cross-defendant W. D. Dodson be required to deliver said bonds to cross-complainant.
The administrator, as cross-defendant, answered the cross-bill and denied the material allegations thereof so far as they were in conflict with the allegations of his original bill.
The foregoing statement of the pleadings is a mere outline thereof for the purpose of indicating the ultimate issues made thereby. Both the original bill of the complainant administrator and the answer and cross-bill of defendant Mrs. Matthews set forth detailed statements of their respective contentions, with specific allegations of time, place and circumstances touching same; but it is, we think, unnecessary to make a further statement of the pleadings, as the Chancellor's findings (which will be hereinafter copied) are, in large measure, responsive to the issues of fact made by the pleadings, and, these findings will be supplemented by statements of such additional facts, pleaded and proved, as may be deemed material when we come to dispose of the appellant's assignments of error.
The cause was heard by the Chancellor, and his findings of fact were embraced in his decree, which decree, including the findings of fact, was entered of record as follows:
that she did not have a safe place to keep them at home, and so he had placed them in the bank so they would be safe.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cartall v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.
...Md. 35, 54 A. 637; Dingley v. Robinson, 149 Wash. 301, 270 P. 1018; Mitchell v. Weaver, 242 Mass. 331, 136 N.E. 166; Dodson v. Matthews, 22 Tenn.App. 49, 117 S.W.2d 969; Andreas v. Andreas, 84 N.J.Eq. 368, 94 A. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co., 132 Ohio St. 21, 4 N.E.2d 917; Casey v. Topliffe, 8......
-
Marlin v. Merrill
... ... Roddy, ... 163 Tenn. 338, 350, 43 S.W.2d 397; Dietzen v. American ... Trust & Banking Co., 175 Tenn. 49, 54, 131 S.W.2d 69, ... 71; Dodson v. Matthews, 22 Tenn.App. 49, 54, 117 ... S.W.2d 969, 972 ... We ... think the evidence fails to sustain a valid gift of the ... ...
-
American Nat. Bank v. Robinson
... ... Allen v. [27 Tenn.App. 654] Hays, 139 Tenn ... 56, 201 S.W. 135; Ferry v. Bryant, 19 Tenn.App. 612, ... 93 S.W.2d 344; Dodson v. Matthews, 22 Tenn.App. 49, ... 117 S.W.2d 969; Miller v. Proctor, 24 Tenn.App. 439, ... 145 S.W.2d 807 ... Defendant ... ...