Dogge v. State
Decision Date | 27 January 1885 |
Citation | 22 N.W. 348,17 Neb. 140 |
Parties | OTTO H. DOGGE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, DEFENDANT IN ERROR |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
ERROR to the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before POUND, J.
AFFIRMED.
J. C Johnston and Lamb, Ricketts & Wilson, for plaintiff in error.
William Leese, Attorney General, for the State.
The plaintiff in error was convicted of practicing medicine in Lancaster county without first having complied with the act "to regulate the practice of medicine in the state of Nebraska," approved March 3d, 1881 (Laws of 1881, pages 282-286). The testimony shows that he is a graduate of one or more medical colleges, and that he has practiced medicine for about eighteen years before removing to this state. He therefore claims that the provisions of the act do not apply to him.
Sec. 1 of the act above referred to declares that "it shall be unlawful for any person to practice medicine, surgery, or obstetrics, or any of the branches thereof, in the state, without first having complied with the provisions of this act relating to registration; and no person practicing medicine, surgery, or obstetrics, or any of the branches thereof, shall be entitled to registration unless possessed of the qualifications required by section four of this act."
Sec. 4, as amended in 1883, is as follows: Laws of 1883, page 246.
Sec. 2 of the act of 1881 requires the person registering as a physician or surgeon to file with the county clerk of the county in which he or she resides a...
To continue reading
Request your trial