Dolan v. Halpern
Decision Date | 25 May 2010 |
Citation | 902 N.Y.S.2d 585,73 A.D.3d 1117 |
Parties | Lynne DOLAN, respondent, v. David HALPERN, etc., et al., defendants, Hazar Michael, etc., et al., appellants. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Furey, Furey, Leverage, Manzione, Williams & Darlington, P.C., Hempstead, N.Y. (Susan Weihs Darlington of counsel), for appellants Hazar Michael and Winthrop Gastroenterology, P.C.
Law Offices of Charles X. Connick, PLLC, Mineola, N.Y. (Barbara A. Myers of counsel), for appellants Steven Geier and Alan S. Lipp.
McAndrew, Conboy & Prisco, LLP, Woodbury, N.Y. (Mary C. Azzaretto of counsel), for respondent.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., JOSEPH COVELLO, RANDALL T. ENG, and ARIEL E. BELEN, JJ.
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendants Hazar Michael and Winthrop Gastroenterology, P.C., appeal, and the defendants Steven Geier and Alan S. Lipp separately appeal, as limited by their respective briefs, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Diamond, J.), dated July 13, 2009, as denied those branches of their separate motions which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with one bill of costs, and those branches of the separate motions of the defendants Hazar Michael and Winthrop Gastroenterology, P.C., and the defendants Steven Geier and Alan S. Lipp, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them are granted.
The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for medical malpractice against, among others, the defendant doctors Steven Geier, Alan Lipp, and Hazar Michael, and Winthrop Gastroenterology, P.C. (hereinafter Winthrop). The plaintiff alleged that Geier, Lipp, and Michael were negligent from September 1, 2002, through November 1, 2004, in their treatment of her, resulting in the need for her to undergo surgery. The plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that those defendants were negligent in failing to administer appropriate tests, in their performance of surgical procedures, and in failing to properly diagnose a bile duct leak.
Geier and Lipp moved, and Michael and Winthrop separately moved, among other things, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. The Supreme Court denied those branches of the respective motions, finding that the plaintiff raised triable issues of fact in opposition to the appellants' respective prima facie showings of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. We reverse.
( Langan v. St. Vincent's Hosp. of N.Y., 64 A.D.3d 632, 632-633, 882 N.Y.S.2d 500 [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Alvarez...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Montagnino v. Inamed Corp.
...(2d Dept 2010); Anonymous v. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, 73 A.D.3d 1104, 902 N.Y.S.2d 147 (2d Dept. 2010); Dolan v. Halpern, 73 A.D.3d 1117, 902 N.Y.S.2d 585 (2d Dept. 2010); Orsi v. Haralabatos, 89 A.D.3d 997, 934 N.Y.S.2d 195 (2d Dept. 2011)). On a motion for summary judgment, a defen......
-
Stukas v. Streiter
...City Health & Hosps. Corp., 74 A.D.3d 1005, 1006, 903 N.Y.S.2d 152; Rizzo v. Moseley, 74 A.D.3d 942, 902 N.Y.S.2d 629; Dolan v. Halpern, 73 A.D.3d 1117, 902 N.Y.S.2d 585; Langan v. St. Vincent's Hosp. of N.Y., 64 A.D.3d 632, 882 N.Y.S.2d 500; Sandmann v. Shapiro, 53 A.D.3d 537, 861 N.Y.S.2d......
-
Montagnino v. Inamed Corp.
...477 (2d Dept 2010); Anonymous v. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, 73 AD3d 1104, 902 N.Y.S.2d 147 (2d Dept.2010); Dolan v. Halpern, 73 AD3d 1117, 902 N.Y.S.2d 585 (2d Dept.2010); Orsi v. Haralabatos, 89 AD3d 997, 934 N.Y.S.2d 195 (2d Dept.2011)). On a motion for summary judgment, a defendant ......
-
Charnisky v. Popowitz
...submit material or evidentiary facts to rebut the defendant's prima facie showing that he or she was not negligent in treating the plaintiff." Id. (citing Langan v Vincent's Hosp. of N.Y., 64 A.D.3d 632, 632-633 [2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; Alvarez v Prospect Hos......