Dollar Concrete Const. Co. v. Watson, A92A2170
Decision Date | 08 February 1993 |
Docket Number | No. A92A2170,A92A2170 |
Citation | 207 Ga.App. 452,428 S.E.2d 379 |
Parties | DOLLAR CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. WATSON et al. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Chambers, Mabry, McClelland & Brooks, Genevieve L. Frazier, Atlanta, for appellant.
William N. Robbins, P.C., William N. Robbins, Joseph A. Maniscalco, Jr., Brian R. Hutchison, Atlanta, for appellees.
Billy Jay Watson and Allison Watson initiated an action against Jacinto Morales and Dollar Construction Company seeking to recover damages for injuries sustained when a vehicle driven by Morales struck Billy Jay Watson. Originally filed in DeKalb County on July 17, 1991, the suit named Dollar Construction Company as the sole defendant and identified Jack Reuben, whose address was in Louisville, Jefferson County, Georgia, as registered agent. It is not known if Jack Reuben was ever served with the suit, and the issue is of no consequence, as Dollar Construction Company was voluntarily dismissed from the action on August 14, 1991. On the same date, without leave of court, the Watsons filed an amended complaint naming Dollar Concrete Construction Company as the sole party defendant, identifying Muriel Dollar as the registered agent, and asserting that the corporation had already been served in Fayette County. It is uncontested that Muriel Dollar was personally served on August 8, 1991 with a copy of the original complaint naming Dollar Construction Company as defendant, although the original return of service from Fayette County was not filed with the Clerk of the Court of DeKalb County.
In January 1992, Dollar Concrete Construction Company filed an answer and motion to dismiss the action alleging that Dollar Concrete Construction Company had been added as a party defendant without leave of court, that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over the corporation, and asserting that the action was now barred by the statute of limitation. The trial court denied the motion to dismiss. We granted Dollar Concrete Construction Company's petition for interlocutory review.
In its single enumeration of error, Dollar Concrete Construction Company asserts that the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss. We agree. OCGA § 9-11-21 states: (Emphasis supplied.) In Aircraft Radio Systems v. Von Schlegell, 168 Ga.App. 109, 111(2), 308 S.E.2d 211 (1983) this court held: (Emphasis supplied.) The record in this case makes it clear that leave of court to add a party to the existing case by amendment was never sought nor obtained. (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Robinson v. Bomar, 122 Ga.App. 564, 567(2), 177 S.E.2d 815 (1970).
As in Slater v. Brigadier Homes, 198 Ga.App. 67, 400 S.E.2d 338 (1990), Dollar Concrete Construction Company was not a party to the suit at the time the amended complaint was filed. Therefore, Id. at...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. Vencare, Inc.
...v. Todd, supra at 822, 229 S.E.2d 649; Young v. Rider, 208 Ga.App. 147, 148(1), 430 S.E.2d 117 (1993); Dollar Concrete Constr. Co. v. Watson, 207 Ga.App. 452, 453, 428 S.E.2d 379 (1993); Slater v. Brigadier Homes, 198 Ga.App. 67, 68, 400 S.E.2d 338 (1990). Among the factors that the trial c......
-
Foskey v. Vidalia City School
...not served the right defendant under the wrong name. OCGA §§ 9-10-132; 9-11-15(c); 9-11-17; 9-11-21; Dollar Concrete Constr. Co. v. Watson, 207 Ga.App. 452, 453-454, 428 S.E.2d 379 (1993); accord U.S. Xpress v. W. Timothy Askew & Co., supra at 730, 391 S.E.2d 707; Pacific Nat. Fire Ins. Co.......
-
In re
...(2006); El Chico Restaurants, Inc. v. Transp. Ins. Co., 235 Ga.App. 427, 428(2), 509 S.E.2d 681 (1998); Dollar Concrete Constr. Co. v. Watson, 207 Ga.App. 452, 453, 428 S.E.2d 379 (1993); Aircraft Radio Systems v. Von Schlegell, 168 Ga.App. 109, 111(2), 308 S.E.2d 211 (1983). As we have exp......
-
Bd. of Comm'rs of Glynn Cnty. v. Johnson
...in original.) Valdosta Hotel Properties v. White, 278 Ga.App. 206, 209(1), 628 S.E.2d 642 (2006). See Dollar Concrete Constr. Co. v. Watson, 207 Ga.App. 452, 453, 428 S.E.2d 379 (1993). Because the plaintiffs never sought leave of court to add Mr. Thaw as a party in his individual capacity,......