Domansky v. Berkovitch

Decision Date28 October 1997
Citation243 A.D.2d 374,664 N.Y.S.2d 556
Parties, 1997 N.Y. Slip Op. 8831 Martin DOMANSKY, etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Alexander BERKOVITCH, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Scott DOMANSKY, etc., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Alexander BERKOVITCH, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ezio Scaldaferri, for Martin Domansky, and Scott Domansky.

Henry T. Berger, for Alexander Berkovitch.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered August 9, 1996, which, in an action for an accounting of loan proceeds held by the subject entities, appointed a temporary receiver to take possession of the subject entities, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Judgment, same court and Justice, entered December 5, 1996, insofar as appealed from, awarding plaintiff Martin Domansky damages against defendant Berkovitch based on a guarantee, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

A temporary receiver was properly appointed upon a sufficient showing of plaintiffs' interests in the subject entities and guarantees of the loans, and that the loan proceeds were being misappropriated or diverted (CPLR 6401[a]; see, Dolgoff v. Projectavision, Inc., 235 A.D.2d 311, 653 N.Y.S.2d 111, 112-113). Summary judgment on plaintiff's first cause of action was properly granted, the documentary evidence establishing that defendant Berkovitch had personally guaranteed the loan and issued a check in repayment that had been returned unpaid, that the loan continued to be carried on the books and records of the corporate principal, and that defendant's claims of repayment were otherwise without merit.

MURPHY, P.J., and NARDELLI, WILLIAMS and COLABELLA, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Schron v. Grunstein
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 6, 2012
    ...weight under the terms of the promissory notes and loan agreements executed by the parties ( see Domansky v. Berkovitch, 243 A.D.2d 374, 374–75, 664 N.Y.S.2d 556 [1st Dept 1997]; In re Moak, 92 A.D.3d 1040, 1044, 938 N.Y.S.2d 648 [3d Dept 2012] ). Moreover, promissory notes, like other cont......
  • VSP Associates, P.C. v. 46 Estates Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 28, 1997
  • People v. Miranda
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 28, 1997
  • Domansky v. Berkovitch
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • December 2, 1997

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT