Donaher v. City of Boston
| Decision Date | 26 February 1879 |
| Citation | 126 Mass. 309 |
| Parties | Peter J. Donaher v. City of Boston |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Argued November 18, 1878
Suffolk. Petition to enforce a mechanic's lien for labor performed in the erection of a building on land of the respondent. At the trial in the Superior Court, before Rockwell, J., the jury returned a verdict for the petitioner; and the respondent alleged exceptions, the material parts of which appear in the opinion.
Exceptions sustained.
R. D. Smith, for the respondent.
G. W. Morse & J. C. Lane, for the petitioner.
OPINION
The petitioner made a contract with one Pierce to deliver to him all the hammered granite required for a schoolhouse on Francis Street, in process of erection on land of the city of Boston, for an entire price. Pierce was employed by the city under a written contract to erect the building. The petitioner gave no notice that he should claim a lien for materials furnished. The granite was wrought at Quincy, and so much of it as was delivered under the petitioner's contract with Pierce was delivered at the school-house. Till thus delivered, it was the property of the petitioner; and, after delivery, it was the property of Pierce, which he might use in erecting the schoolhouse or for any other purpose, so far, at least, as the city of Boston was concerned. Under these circumstances, we are of opinion that the petitioner has no lien for labor performed in preparing the granite, as labor performed or furnished in erecting the school-house. he merely furnished material wrought to a stipulated condition for a stipulated price. The St. of 1872, c. 318, § 1, which provides that, under certain specified conditions, a lien may be maintained for labor performed under an entire contract for labor and materials, was not intended to reach cases in which finished articles of merchandise have been sold at a fixed price to a contractor. The labor performed by the petitioner at the premises was merely in completion of his contract to furnish granite wrought to a certain condition. The learned judge of the Superior Court erred, therefore, in refusing to rule on this point, as requested by the respondent, that the petitioner had furnished no labor upon the building for which he was entitled to a lien.
Exceptions sustained.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Daley v. Legate
...8 Allen, 543. The cases of Tracy v. Wetherell, 165 Mass. 113, 42 N.E. 497, Eisnor v. Dinand, 165 Mass. 116, 42 N.E. 498, and Donaher v. City of Boston, 126 Mass. 309, distinguishable. In those cases it was held that subcontractors who had agreed to furnish materials wrought to a stipulated ......
-
Tracy v. Wetherell
... ... labor and materials," within Pub.St. c. 191, §§ 1, 2, ... and the case is governed by Donaher v. Boston, 126 ... Mass. 309. The distinction is a very old one, and, although ... there always ... ...
-
Wilson v. Sleeper
...of a building. Dewing v. Wilbraham Congregational Society, 13 Gray 414. See also Jones v. Keen, 115 Mass. 170. The case of Donaher v. Boston, 126 Mass. 309, cited the respondents, has no bearing on the case at bar. It was decided there that one who has agreed to furnish to a contractor mate......
-
Smalley v. Hamblin
...v. Railway Co., 48 Me. 379; Prescott v. Locke, 51 N.H. 94; Pitkin v. Noyes, 48 N.H. 294. See Bacon v. Parker, 137 Mass. 309; Donaher v. Boston, 126 Mass. 309; Tracy v. Wetherell, 165 Mass. 113, 42 N.E. Exceptions overruled. ...