Dorey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

Decision Date23 November 1898
Citation172 Mass. 234,51 N.E. 974
PartiesDOREY v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INS. CO.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
COUNSEL

J.W. Cummings, Edw. Higginson, and Jas. T. Cummings, for plaintiff.

Jennings & Morton, for defendant.

OPINION

HAMMOND, J.

This is an action by the administratrix of the estate of Orissime Dorey on an insurance policy on the life of said Dorey, dated May 13, 1895. By the terms of the policy, no obligation was assumed by the defendant, unless the insured was, at its date, in sound health. At the trial before a jury, the only issue was whether or not Dorey was in sound health at that time. Upon this question, evidence was introduced on each side. Without reciting it here in detail, it is sufficient to say that the evidence introduced by the plaintiff would, if believed, warrant a verdict for the plaintiff, and that introduced by the defendant would, if believed, warrant a verdict for the defendant. A pure question of fact, and not of law, was raised. The first request was rightly refused. Although the second request was not given in its exact terms, it was substantially given, and in clear language. Exceptions overruled.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Harris v. Security Life Insurance Company of America
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 28, 1913
    ... ... been practised or not. Flanigan v. Ins. Co., 231 ... Ill. 399; Royal Circle v. Achterrath, 204 Ill. 549 ... It has always been the ... Ins. Co. v. Howle, 62 Oh. St. 204. "The ... question of sound health is for the jury." Dorey v. Ins ... Co., 172 Mass. 234 ...          J. C ... Rosenberger and Kersey Coates ... ...
  • Fleckenstein v. Provident Ins. Company
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1921
    ... ... defendant is not bound by any estoppel or waiver. Roth v ... Mutual Reserve Life Ins. Co. 89 C. C. A. 262 ...          The ... general rule is that a return of the ... which the minds of reasonable men may differ. Dorey v ... Met. Life Ins. Co. 172 Mass. 234, 51 N.E. 974; 25 Cyc ... 950; Horne v. Hancock Mut ... ...
  • Fleckenstein v. Provident Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • North Dakota Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1921
    ...is not the question made one of fact for the jury, a question upon which the minds of reasonable men may differ? Dorey v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 172 Mass. 234, 51 N. E. 974; 25 Cyc. 950; Horne v. Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 53 Pa. Super. Ct. 330, 333; Healy v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 37 App. D. C.......
  • Packard v. Metro. Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • January 6, 1903
    ...leave these questions to the jury." 2 Par. Cont. (8th Ed.) *407; Billings v. Insurance Co., 70 Vt. 477, 41 Atl. 516; Dorey v. Insurance Co., 172 Mass. 234, 51 N. E. 974; Cushman v. Insurance Co., 70 N. Y. 72, 77; Grattan v. Insurance Co., 92 N. Y. 274, 44 Am. Rep. 372. The question of sound......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT