Dorman v. Carnes

Decision Date23 June 1936
Citation96 S.W.2d 869,265 Ky. 361
PartiesDORMAN, Banking Com'r, et al. v. CARNES et al.
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Petition for Rehearing Withdrawn Oct. 27, 1936.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pendleton County.

Action by James R. Dorman, banking commissioner for the Commonwealth of Kentucky, and others against C. W. Carnes and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiffs appeal.

Reversed and remanded.

Galvin & Tracy, and Lewis Levy, all of Cincinnati, for appellants.

L. P Fryer, of Butler, John E. Shepard, of Covington, John P McCartney, of Flemingsburg, and John Best and John Colvin both of Falmouth, for appellees.

CREAL Commissioner.

James R. Dorman, banking commissioner of Kentucky, and Floyd A. Thomasson, special deputy banking commissioner, in charge of liquidation of the Pendleton Bank, are appealing from a judgment of the Pendleton circuit court dismissing their petition as amended in an action whereby they sought to recover of C. W. Carnes and others on a bond executed pursuant to a written agreement between the Pendleton Bank and the Citizens Bank whereby the former took over the assets and assumed the liabilities of the latter.

As appears from the evidence and the inferences drawn therefrom, these institutions were actively engaged in banking business at Falmouth, Ky. prior to April 19, 1930. Some time prior to April, 1930, because of certain existing matters and conditions, the Citizens Bank came under the criticism of the state banking department, but apparently these matters and conditions were adjusted to the satisfaction of the department. This, however, did not alleviate the bank's troubles, since continual withdrawals by depositors exceeded deposits, indicating a loss of confidence by the public in the bank and possibly in some of those in charge of its affairs. Naturally this situation caused embarrassment and great apprehension upon the part of those responsible for the management of the bank. Some of the directors and other officials of this bank approached the president and cashier of the Pendleton Bank with a suggestion or tentative proposal for the consolidation or merger of the two institutions. The evidence as to the discussion of the proposal is scanty; however, it does appear that it was at first received with favor by officers of the Pendleton Bank. In the course of negotiations, representatives of the Citizens Bank who were in position to know, represented or gave as their opinion that bad notes and securities carried as assets in the Citizens Bank would not exceed in the aggregate the sum of $40,000, but in order to satisfy officers and directors of the Pendleton Bank concerning that matter, its president and cashier were permitted to examine notes and securities held by the Citizens Bank. From their examination they concluded that bad or worthless paper held by the Citizens Bank would exceed the sum indicated, and when they so reported, the negotiations were for the time dropped. The proposal, however, was later renewed by parties interested in the Citizens Bank, and negotiations finally resulted in a contract approved by the directors of the respective banks, which, omitting signatures, reads:

"Agreement for the Merging of Pendleton Bank, Falmouth, Ky. and Citizens Bank, Falmouth, Ky.

"This agreement made this the 22nd day of March, 1930, by and between Pendleton Bank, Falmouth, Ky. by C. H. Lee, Jr. President, and Chas. W. Thompson, Cashier, Party of the First Part, and Citizens Bank, Falmouth, Ky. By C. W. Carnes, President, and J. B. Woolery, Cashier, Party of the Second Part, Witnesseth:

"Subject to the provisions that this agreement shall not be binding upon either party hereto, until the terms and conditions herein set forth shall have been lawfully agreed upon by a majority of the Board of Directors of each Bank, ratified and confirmed by the affirmative vote of the stockholders of each Bank owning at least two-thirds of its outstanding Capital Stock, at a meeting to be held on the call of the respective Boards of Directors after publishing notices of the time, place and object of said meeting for two consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in Pendleton County, Ky. and after sending such notices to each stockholder of record of the respective banks by registered mail at least twenty days prior to said meeting, and further subject to the approval of the Banking Commissioner of the State of Kentucky, it is hereby agreed as follows: The party of the second part agrees to sell to the party of the first part, and the party of the first part agrees to buy of the party of the second part the property it now owns on the corner of Shelby and Chapel Streets in the City of Falmouth, Ky. in which the party of the second part now conducts business together with all the assets of said party of the second part consisting of notes, bonds, cash, and all property it may own whether described herein or not upon the following terms:
"First: The said party of the first part is to increase its Capital Stock from $50,500.00 to $83,000.00 and issue to the stockholders of the party of the second part one share of the par value of $50.00 per share, of its stock after said increase is made, for every two (2) shares held in party of the second part's Capital Stock.
"Second: The said party of the first part agrees to hold in its reserve fund, after said stock is increased, the sum of, at least, $83,000.00.
"Third: The said party of the second part agrees that after all the obligations of theirs are paid out of the assets hereby sold to the party of the first part, that the remaining part of said assets must equal the sum in cash, exclusive of the real estate named herein, the sum of $45,000.00, and it is further agreed that said party of second part will execute to said party of the first part a bond with security satisfactory, to party of the first part, for the faithful performance of said agreement.
"Fourth: All notes or obligations due the party of the second part that are paid or renewed by new obligations and accepted by the party of the first part, shall release party of the second part from any further liability for their payment, and in the event all the obligations of the party of the second part owes to its creditors are paid then all liability on said bond ceases.
"Fifth: If the collection on the personal assets conveyed herein to the party of the first part are not paid in cash or by renewals accepted by the party of the first part by the 20th day of October, 1931, to the amount of all its obligations of the party of the second part to its creditors and the further sum of $45,000.00 then the bond herein mentioned shall be due, and the party of the second part shall pay to said party of the first part the amount said collections and renewals lack of amounting to said aggregate named in this clause.
"Sixth: The party of the first part agrees to amend its charter and provide for ten directors to be composed of the present directors of the party of the first part and three directors of the party of the second part, all of whom will hold said positions until the next regular election of directors by said party of the first part.
"Seventh: If the party of the second part and its sureties have to pay to the party of the first part any sum by reason of the collections and renewals named not being sufficient to pay all the obligations owing by said party of the second part together with the said sum of $45,000.00 named herein by the 20th day of October, 1931, the time named in said bond, and the party of the second part has fulfilled the obligation of this agreement, then it may out of the uncollected assets herein assigned and not collected or renewed as provided herein, have the right to collect, if it can, the amount it had to pay under the terms of this agreement.
"Eighth: In estimating the amount obtained by the party of the first part on the personal assets sold to it herein, by payments or renewals the party of the second part will not receive any credit for the amount that is received for unearned interest on notes or obligations received by the party of the first part from the party of the second part from the date of this contract.
"Ninth: Pendleton Bank hereby designates C. H. Lee, Jr. and Chas. W. Thompson and Citizens Bank designates C. W. Carnes and J. B. Woolery as the Committees, to act for them respectively, in carrying out this agreement, with authority to do or cause to be done all things necessary or proper in the performance thereof.
"Ratified and approved by the Board of Directors March 22, 1930."

The bond signed by appellees which was executed pursuant to the third clause of the contract and which is the basis of this action omitting the signatures reads:

"We, the undersigned, hereby covenant with Pendleton Bank, Falmouth, Ky. that we will bind ourselves as sureties for the Citizens Bank, Falmouth, Ky. in consideration of the foregoing contract that said Citizens Bank will full comply with the terms of said contract as to payment of the sum named therein. In the event the personal assets of said Citizens Bank fails to discharge in cash or by renewals of notes due it an amount equal to all its obligations and the further sum of $45,000.00 and in default of its so doing we bind ourselves to pay same on the 20th day of October, 1931, as named in the foregoing contract."

"Done this 18th day of March 1930."

All steps required by section 555, Kentucky Statutes, for the consolidation of corporations were taken, but the agreement was not acknowledged as required by section 556 of the statute; however, the charter of the Pendleton Bank was amended as provided in the agreement and in strict conformity with the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Dorman, Banking Com'R, v. Carnes
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • June 23, 1936
  • GGNSC Louisville St. Matthews LLC v. Badgett
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • March 22, 2018
    ...that might be legally done; or anything of benefit to one or of detriment, loss, or inconvenience to the other." Dorman v. Carnes, 96 S.W.2d 869, 875 (Ky. 1936). Here, the parties entered into the Mt. Holly arbitration agreement that required them to refrain from doing something that might ......
  • City of Louisville v. Redmon
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • January 9, 1940

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT