Dorset House Ass'n, Inc. v. Dorset, Inc.
| Decision Date | 29 May 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 78-1810,78-1810 |
| Citation | 371 So.2d 541 |
| Parties | DORSET HOUSE ASSOCIATION, INC., a non-profit Florida condominium corporation, Appellant, v. DORSET, INC., etc., et al., Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Charles L. Neustein, Miami Beach, for appellant.
Malspeis, Lococo & Brown and Morton P. Brown, North Miami, for appellees.
Before HAVERFIELD, C. J., and PEARSON and SCHWARTZ, JJ.
The plaintiff-appellant sought to foreclose a lien pursuant to Section 711.15, Florida Statutes (1975), for the alleged failure of a condominium owner to pay his proportionate share of the maintenance due. Defendant-appellee Dorset, Inc., the unit owner and developer of the condominium, answered and raised as an affirmative defense the allegation that it (the developer) was not obligated for maintenance payments because of an exemption from payment during the "Developers' Maintenance Period." It was alleged that this exemption was a provision of the recorded Declaration of Condominium. After the filing of affidavits, the trial judge granted the defendant's motion for summary final judgment and entered judgment thereon. Thereafter, the plaintiff moved for a rehearing, and the trial judge entered an amended final judgment providing:
"ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the granting of the Final Summary Judgment in favor of the Defendant, DORSET, INC., and against the Plaintiff, DORSET HOUSE ASSOCIATION, INC., shall not act as estoppel by fact, estoppel by judgment or res judicata in any subsequent action that the Plaintiff herein may cho(o)se to bring against the Defendant, DORSET, INC., which future action may be predicated upon the Plaintiff's claim that the Defendant failed to maintain the subject condominium during the 'developer's maintenance period'."
The trial court wished to make it clear that it was deciding only that the plaintiff did not have a statutory lien against the defendant. We hold that it does not appear without genuine issue of material fact that defendant is entitled to a judgment. An issue of fact arises from the pleadings in the plaintiff's reply to the affirmative defenses concerning the defendant's entitlement to the exemption provided in the Declaration of Condominium. The defendant alleged that it had complied with the requirement of the Declaration of Condominium by maintaining the project during the "Developers' Maintenance Period." By its reply, the plaintiff alleged that the defendant had not complied with that provision of the declaration. The issue was not shown to be less than genuine by the affidavits on file. Therefore, the summary final judgment must be reversed. See the principles of law in Harvey Building, Inc. v. Haley, 175 So.2d 780 (Fla.1965); and Turner Produce Company v. Lake Shore Growers Cooperative Association, 217 So.2d 856, 860-861 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).
In addition, it is our view that the amended summary judgment shows error because even where a summary judgment should be granted but it appears that the plaintiff may have a cause of action not pleaded, the proper procedure is to enter summary judgment but with leave to amend in that suit. See Hart Properties, Inc. v. Slack, 159 So.2d 236, 240 (Fla.1963); Sorrells v. Mullins, 303 So.2d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); and Bernard Marko & Associates, Inc. v. Steele, 230 So.2d 42 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).
Accordingly, the judgment and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Palm Bay Towers Corp. v. Brooks, 84-576
...this defense does raise a genuine issue of material fact which precludes the entry of summary judgment. See Dorset House Association v. Dorset, Inc., 371 So.2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). The summary judgment involved on this appeal was entered against Palm Bay Towers Corporation, Conwall, Inc.......
-
Coudry v. City of Titusville
...pet. den. 418 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1982); First Nat. Bank of Tampa v. Pappas, 372 So.2d 989 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Dorset House Ass'n, Inc. v. Dorset, Inc., 371 So.2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Thompson Aircraft Tire Corp., 353 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), appeal after ......
-
Best Meridian Ins. Co. v. Tuaty
... ... See Cat `N Fiddle, Inc. v. Century Ins. Co., 213 So.2d 701, 704 ... ...
-
Gulf Power Co. v. Cox Cable Corp.
...the trial court should not grant a summary judgment which does not grant leave to amend the complaint. Dorset House Ass'n, Inc. v. Dorset, Inc., 371 So.2d 541 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1979).3 We are not holding that Cox had a duty to actively supervise its independent contractor, Burnup and Sims, but ......