Dorsey v. State
Decision Date | 24 March 2015 |
Docket Number | No. A14A1893.,A14A1893. |
Citation | 331 Ga.App. 486,771 S.E.2d 167 |
Parties | DORSEY v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Sheueli Cindy Wang, for Appellant.
Joshua Daniel Morrison, Paul L. Howard Jr., Lori Lee Canfield, for Appellee.
Markell Dorsey and four co-defendants were tried jointly before a jury for murder and other offenses related to the shooting death of Ron Strozier. After the trial, Dorsey was convicted of voluntary manslaughter, conspiracy to commit aggravated assault, conspiracy to commit criminal damage to property, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony and theft by receiving stolen property. Dorsey appeals, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence, the sentencing on both conspiracy counts, the denial of a motion to sever, the denial of a mistrial after impermissible character testimony, and the effectiveness of his trial counsel. However, there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict; any error in sentencing on the conspiracy counts was harmless; there was no abuse of discretion in the denial of a severance; the trial court properly struck the improper character testimony and gave a curative jury instruction, rather than granting a mistrial; and there has been no showing that trial counsel's performance was both deficient and prejudicial. Accordingly, we affirm.
Dorsey argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his voluntary manslaughter conviction because the state did not prove that any of the co-defendants shot Strozier. However, in a separate appeal, the Georgia Supreme Court found sufficient evidence to affirm the convictions of co-defendant Michael Grissom, noting that “[t]he relevant events arose out of a feud between Grissom's friend and co-defendant Markell Dorsey, and Dorsey's associates, on the one side, and an individual known only as ‘D–Bone,’ and D–Bone's associates, on the other.” Grissom v. State, 296 Ga. 406, 768 S.E.2d 494 (2015). Pursuant to Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979), the Court determined that the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdicts, showed the following facts.
Grissom, supra at 408, 768 S.E.2d 494.
In addition to the foregoing, the evidence showed that Dorsey was present when the plan to retaliate against D–Bone was made, that he was present when there were discussions about seeking out Strozier, that he admitted entering the woods on the night in question for the purpose of shooting at D–Bone and his truck, that he was in the woods with Grissom and others when Strozier was shot, that he fled from the scene of the shooting, and that he later abandoned the stolen car with the suspected murder weapon in it.
In arguing that the state failed to prove that any of the co-defendants shot Strozier, Dorsey points to inconsistencies in the evidence. But as the Supreme Court explained, “[r]esolving evidentiary conflicts and inconsistencies and assessing witness credibility are the province of the fact finder, not the appellate court.” Grissom, supra at 408(1), 768 S.E.2d 494 (citation and punctuation omitted). In this case, “the evidence presented at trial, as summarized above, was sufficient to support the verdict.” Id.
Citing Braverman v. United States, 317 U.S. 49, 63 S.Ct. 99, 87 L.Ed. 23 (1942), Dorsey contends that the trial court erred in sentencing him separately on the two conspiracy counts because the evidence only showed a single conspiracy. Indeed, Price v. State, 247 Ga. 58, 60, 273 S.E.2d 854 (1981). The state counters that the evidence showed that there were two separate agreements, not just one, and thus Braverman is inapplicable. However, we need not resolve that issue because even if we assume error in the sentencing of Dorsey on both conspiracy counts, the error was harmless.
Our Supreme Court has adopted the rule of Price, supra at 61, n. 5, 273 S.E.2d 854. Here, the trial court imposed a total sentence of ten years for the two conspiracy offenses, sentencing Dorsey to serve five years for conspiracy to commit aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and another five years for conspiracy to commit criminal damage to property in the first degree.
That sentence was within the legal limits for conviction of a single conspiracy. “A person convicted of the offense of criminal conspiracy to commit a felony shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year nor more than one-half the maximum period of time for which he could have been sentenced if he had been convicted of the crime conspired to have been committed.”
OCGA § 16–4–8. The maximum period of time for which Dorsey could have been sentenced if he had been convicted of the aggravated assault that was the underlying subject of one of the conspiracy counts is 20 years. See former OCGA § 16–5–21(b)1 ( ). Thus, the maximum sentence for conspiracy to commit aggravated assault is one-half of that 20 years, or ten years. Because the total sentence imposed for both conspiracy offenses was ten years, the sentence was within the legal limits for a person convicted of a single conspiracy to commit aggravated assault, and therefore any error in sentencing Dorsey for both conspiracy charges was harmless. Price, supra.
Dorsey claims that the trial court erred in failing to sever his trial from that of Grissom because they presented antagonistic defenses and he was unable to fully present his statement to police which implicated Grissom as the shooter. The claim is without merit.
Barge v. State, 294 Ga. 567, 570(3), 755 S.E.2d 166 (2014) (citations and punctuation omitted).
While Dorsey claims he and Grissom...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Evans v. State
...process[, so] we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying [her] motion to sever." Dorsey v. State , 331 Ga. App. 486, 491 (3), (771 S.E.2d 167) (2015) (citations and punctuation omitted). See Majors , supra at 140, 416 S.E.2d 156 (1) (affirming denial of severan......
-
Tucker v. Tucker
...that constitutes the conspiracy, and if there is only one agreement there can be only one conspiracy." Dorsey v. State , 331 Ga. App. 486, 489 (2), 771 S.E.2d 167 (2015) (citation and punctuation omitted). We review the application of the merger doctrine de novo. See Brown v. State , 314 Ga......
-
Tucker v. State
...conspiracy convictions - twenty years (ten for each count) - exceeds the maximum for a single conspiracy conviction. See Dorsey, 331 Ga.App. at 489-490 (2). A conviction conspiracy to commit a felony punishable by life imprisonment carries a maximum sentence of ten years, while a conviction......
-
Hawkins v. State
...if it appears that a mistrial was essential to preserve the defendant’s right to a fair trial." (Citation omitted.) Dorsey v. State , 331 Ga. App. 486, 491 (4), 771 S.E.2d 167 (2015). Hearsay is defined as a "statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or h......