Dorta v. Blackburn, 73-1094
| Decision Date | 17 September 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. 73-1094,73-1094 |
| Citation | 302 So.2d 450 |
| Parties | David DORTA, a minor, By and Through his parent and natural guardian, Emile Dorta, and Emile Dorta, Individually, et al., Appellants, v. Kevin BLACKBURN, Jr., a minor, By and Through his father and next friend, Kevin Blackburn, Sr., Individually, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Helliwell, Melrose & DeWolf and Marsha L. Lyons, Miami, for appellants.
Frates, Floyd, Pearson, Stewart, Proenza & Richman and Ira H. Leesfield, Miami, for appellees.
Before HENDRY and HAVERFIELD, JJ., and SMITH, SAMUEL, Associate Judge.
Defendant-appellants seek review of an adverse final judgment entered in favor of plaintiff-appellees in this negligence action.
Plaintiffs Kevin Blackburn, Jr., a minor, and his father, Kevin Blackburn, Sr., as parent of the minor plaintiff and individually, filed an amended complaint against the defendants, David Dorta and his father, Emile Dorta, as natural guardian and individually, wherein they alleged that the minor defendant David Dorta negligently operated a dune buggy thereby causing the vehicle to overturn and injure the minor plaintiff, a passenger therein. The complaint also alleged negligent entrustment and failure to supervise on behalf of the minor defendant's father, Emile Dorta. In response thereto, defendant-appellants filed an answer wherein they raised the defenses of contributory negligence and assumption of the risk. Subsequently, the cause came on for trial by jury. At the close of plaintiff's case and again at the close of all the evidence, defendants moved for a directed verdict and as grounds therefor alleged that the evidence demonstrated that the minor plaintiff had assumed the risk of harm. Plaintiffs also moved for a directed verdict. Both parties' motions were denied. Thereafter, defense counsel requested that the trial judge instruct the jury on the doctrine of assumption of the risk. The judge refused on the ground that the defense of assumption of the risk had been merged into comparative negligence. The trial court instructed the jury that minor defendant was negligent as a matter of law and also gave the jurors instructions on the law of comparative negligence. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the minor plaintiff's father for $3,000 and for the minor plaintiff in the sum of $43,250 plus costs. Judgment was entered thereon and defendant-appellants appeal therefrom.
One of the points of defendant-appellants urges as error the refusal of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kopischke v. First Continental Corp.
...S.W.2d 379 (1959); Harris v. Hercules, Inc., 328 F.Supp. 360 (E.D.Ark.1971). "Appellant directs us to a Florida case, Dorta v. Blackburn, Fla.App., 302 So.2d 450 (1973), in which a Florida District Court of Appeals held that the Florida State Supreme " 'appears to have recognized the contin......
-
Wilson v. Gordon
...328 S.W.2d 379 (1959); Harris v. Hercules, Inc., 328 F.Supp. 360 (E.D.Ark.1971) Appellant directs us to a Florida case, Dorta v. Blackburn, Fla.App., 302 So.2d 450 (1973), in which a Florida District Court of Appeals held that the Florida State Supreme Court 'appears to have recognized the ......
-
Blackburn v. Dorta
...3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, and Florida Appellate Rule 4.5(b). The District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Dorta v. Blackburn, 302 So.2d 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), found that the doctrine of assumption of risk is still viable as an absolute bar to recovery subsequent to our adoption of......
-
Rea v. Leadership Housing, Inc., 74--612
...(192 N.W.2d 828) In reaching this decision we recognize the contrary position adopted by the Third District in Dorta v. Blackburn, Fla.App.1974, 302 So.2d 450. Most respectfully, we feel that the decision in Dorta is inconsistent with the underlying rationale of loss distribution in proport......