Doscher v. Doscher
| Decision Date | 12 March 1981 |
| Citation | 438 N.Y.S.2d 28,80 A.D.2d 945 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Brandt H. DOSCHER, Respondent, v. Sondra D. DOSCHER, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Shedler, Weiss & Kozupsky, New York City (Benjamin Shedler, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Saftler & Saftler, Garden City (Harold B. Saftler, Garden City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before KANE, J. P., and MAIN, MIKOLL, HERLIHY and YESAWICH, JJ.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Sullivan County, entered November 5, 1979, which modified alimony and support provisions of a divorce decree.
Petitioner and respondent were married in 1969. On May 10, 1977, they executed a separation agreement providing that petitioner would pay respondent $500 per month, $250 per month to be considered as support for two children and $250 per month to be regarded as alimony. In June, 1977, the parties were divorced. The separation agreement was incorporated, but not merged, in the divorce decree. Two years later petitioner sought a downward modification of the alimony and child support payments on the ground of a substantial change in his financial condition. Family Court, after a brief hearing, ordered that petitioner's alimony payments be reduced to $25 per week and his child support payments to $35 per week. This was error. Where the reversal in a spouse's financial condition is brought about by the spouse's own actions or inactions, the court should not grant a downward modification (Hickland v. Hickland, 39 N.Y.2d 1, 5, 382 N.Y.S.2d 475, 346 N.E.2d 243, cert. den. 429 U.S. 941, 97 S.Ct. 357, 50 L.Ed.2d 310).
Here, the evidence indicated that the drastic reduction in earnings is attributable to petitioner's own behavior. At the time of the divorce he earned in the neighborhood of $25,000 per year. At the time of the hearing he allegedly earned $7,800 per year operating a clothing store for his mother. Petitioner admitted that there were other jobs that he could have had but they were not at the $25,000 level. The proper amount of support payable is not determined by a spouse's current economic situation but by a spouse's ability to provide (Kay v. Kay, 37 N.Y.2d 632, 637, 376 N.Y.S.2d 443, 339 N.E.2d 143). The record indicates that petitioner is capable of earning more than $7,800 a year. Moreover, a family business is involved here and it appears that petitioner had some input in fixing his own salary. Family Court, in reducing...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Rush v. Rush
... ... Hickland, 39 N.Y.2d 1, 382 N.Y.S.2d 475, 346 N.E.2d 243 (1976) cert. den., 429 U.S. 941, 97 S.Ct. 357, 50 L.Ed.2d 310 (1976); Doscher v. Doscher, 80 A.D.2d 945, 438 N.Y.S.2d 28 (3rd Dept.1981) aff'd, 54 N.Y.2d 655, 442 N.Y.S.2d 507, 425 N.E.2d 896 (1981) ... PUBLIC ASSISTANCE ... ...
-
Fierro v. Fierro
...527 N.Y.S.2d 748, 522 N.E.2d 1045, citing Matter of Doscher v. Doscher, 54 N.Y.2d 655, 442 N.Y.S.2d 507, 425 N.E.2d 896, affg. 80 A.D.2d 945, 438 N.Y.S.2d 28). Where, as here, the parent is imprisoned for civil contempt for failure to pay support, such payments should continue to accrue dur......
-
Polite v. Polite
...N.E.2d 143; Matter of Chenango County Support Collection Unit v. De Brie, 100 A.D.2d 687, 688, 473 N.Y.S.2d 890; Matter of Doscher v. Doscher, 80 A.D.2d 945, 438 N.Y.S.2d 28; Matter of Garfield v. Garfield, 29 A.D.2d 928, 289 N.Y.S.2d The Family Court determined respondent's earning capacit......
-
Kronenberg v. Kronenberg
...is brought about by the spouse's own actions or inactions, the court should not grant a downward modification" (Matter of Doscher v. Doscher, 80 A.D.2d 945, 438 N.Y.S.2d 28, affd. 54 N.Y.2d 655, 442 N.Y.S.2d 507, 425 N.E.2d 896). Accordingly, respondent's loss of income cannot serve as a ba......