Double v. Sawtell
Decision Date | 09 April 1925 |
Docket Number | (No. 211.) |
Citation | 271 S.W. 646 |
Parties | DOUBLE et al. v. SAWTELL et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, McLennan County; James P. Alexander, Judge.
Action by J. B. Sawtell and others against C. C. Double and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Keys & Mason, of Mexia, for appellants.
Weatherby & Rogers, of Waco, for appellees.
This suit was filed by appellees to recover $1,162.46 on deposit in the First National Bank of Normangee, Tex., in the name of C. C. Double, appellees alleging that they entered into a contract, by the terms of which they purchased an interest in certain oil leases on which appellants were then drilling a well, and made deposits in said bank in the name of appellant Double in payment therefor, said money to be used only in payment for drilling said well for oil on said lands. Appellees alleged further that appellant Double had breached said contract by abandoning the drilling of said well, etc., and that there remained in said bank $1,162.46 of the money so deposited by appellees, etc. The case was tried before the court without a jury. The court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, which are in no way challenged by appellants, and are hereby adopted by this court, as follows "Findings of Fact.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dunn v. Lamar County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 1
...App.) 286 S. W. 607; Martin v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 102 S. W. 131; Bristol v. Gas Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 273 S. W. 746; Double Sawtell (Tex. Civ. App.) 271 S. W. 646; Schaff v. Fancher (Tex. Civ. App.) 215 S. W. 861; Lewis v. Pitts (Tex. Civ. App.) 275 S. W. 473; Paris v. Estes (Tex. Civ. Ap......
-
Johnson v. Wiley
...cannot be considered by this court. Supreme Assembly of Modern Americans v. Mitchell (Tex. Civ. App.) 275 S. W. 224; Double et al. v. Sawtell (Tex. Civ. App.) 271 S. W. 646; Schaff v. Stripling (Tex. Civ. App.) 265 S. W. However, if appellant had copied his only assignment, which was that t......
-
Fleming v. Pellum
...determine a conflict between the opinion in this case and the opinions in Reed v. Murphy (Tex. Civ. App.) 276 S. W. 951; Double v. Sawtell (Tex. Civ. App.) 271 S. W. 646, and other cases, on the question whether a party can have his assignments of error considered which complain of the insu......