Douglas County v. Hayes
Decision Date | 16 June 1897 |
Docket Number | 7454 |
Citation | 71 N.W. 1023,52 Neb. 191 |
Parties | DOUGLAS COUNTY v. THOMAS HAYES |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
ERROR from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before AMBROSE, J. Affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
J. L Kaley and A. C. Troup, for plaintiff in error.
Mahoney Minahan & Smyth, contra.
The defendant in error, a policeman of the city of Omaha, filed his claim with the board of county commissioners of Douglas county on account of three days' attendance in the district court as a witness in as many criminal cases. There was a disallowance of this claim because the claimant was a policeman, and he appealed to the district court of said county, in which there was an answer by which was asserted his official position as a bar to his recovery. To this defense a general demurrer was sustained. From the judgment which followed this ruling the county has prosecuted error proceedings to this court.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pardue v. Mo. Pac. R. Co.
... ... 's lien from the time of filing the claim of lien.Appeal from district court, Lancaster county; Hall, Judge.Action by Lyman F. Pardue against the Missouri Pacific Railroad Company and H. McKee ... ...
-
Pardue v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company
... ... APPEAL ... from the district court of Lancaster county. Heard below ... before HALL, J. Reversed ... ... Reversed ... ...