Douglas v. Campbell
Decision Date | 08 February 1909 |
Citation | 116 S.W. 211 |
Parties | DOUGLAS v. CAMPBELL et al. |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Randolph County; J. W. Meeks, Judge.
Action by J. H. Douglas against Jas. W. Campbell and others. From a judgment dismissing the complaint after sustaining a demurrer thereto, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
The complaint, omitting caption, is as follows: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial7 cases
-
Wood v. Strickland 8212 1285
...v. City of Lawrence, 181 Mass. 127, 63 N.E. 400 (1902); Sorrels v. Matthews, 129 Ga. 319, 58 S.E. 819 (1907); Douglass v. Campbell, 89 Ark. 254, 116 S.W. 211 (1909); Barnard v. Shelburne, 216 Mass. 19, 102 N.E. 1095 (1913); Sweeney v. Young, 82 N.H. 159, 131 A. 155 (1925) (absolute immunity......
-
Springdale Bd. of Educ. v. Bowman by Luker, 87-147
...arbitrarily or without reason has a remedy by mandamus to compel the school authority to reinstate the pupil. Douglas v. Campbell, 89 Ark. 254, 116 S.W. 211 (1909). This case is in chancery court through a legal fiction, an oxymoron, called a mandatory injunction. (Literally, a mandatory in......
-
Strickland v. Inlow
...be their duty." In Arkansas the immunity is a qualified one by decision law and an absolute immunity by statute. In Douglass v. Campbell, 89 Ark. 254, 116 S.W. 211 (1909), the Court stated the qualified immunity of teachers and school board in the suspension and expulsion of pupils, as "It ......
-
Strickland v. Inlow
...of the state and local governments, which in this case have long provided an appropriate judicial remedy. E. g., Douglas v. Campbell, 89 Ark. 254, 116 S.W. 211 (1909). 1 The practical effect of the suspension was to cause the girls to fail their entire sophomore year. It will be possible fo......
Request a trial to view additional results