Douglas v. Miller
| Decision Date | 29 November 1967 |
| Parties | Application of Charles E. DOUGLAS, Petitioner, for a Judgment under Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules in the Nature of Certiorari v. Gordon MILLER, County Attorney and Head of the Department of Law, WestchesterCounty, New York, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court |
William L. Darrow, Larchmont, for petitioner.
Gordon Miller, County Atty., White Plains, for respondent.
Respondent, a county department head, annually rates the performance of the employees in his department for the purpose of determining whether such employees shall receive a salary increment. Increments are awarded only if the rating is satisfactory. In September of 1966 respondent rated petitioner--an employee in his department--as unsatisfactory. This article 78 proceeding was instituted within four months thereafter to review that determination.
The determination is reviewable in an article 78 proceeding. While no case has been discovered that has passed on the issue of whether a performance rating is judicially reviewable and one author argues that such review is not justified (Kaplan, The Law of Civil Service, p. 191), review may be had under familiar principles. Administrative decisions made in the exercise of discretion that are arbitrary and unreasonable constitute an abuse of discretion (Matter of Diocese of Rochester v. Planning Bd., etc., 1 N.Y.2d 508, 520, 154 N.Y.S.2d 849, 856, 136 N.E.2d 827, 832). Under traditional concepts and by statute (CPLR 7803(3)) a determination affected by an abuse of discretion is subject to judicial review. This is so even though the discretion conferred is absolute (Matter of Board of Higher Education of City of New York v. Allen, 6 N.Y.2d 127, 188 N.Y.S.2d 515, 160 N.E.2d 60). Of course, the court's review is a narrow one. A determination must lack a rational basis to be arbitrary and capricious (Matter of Kaplan v. O'Connell, 281 App.Div. 46, 117 N.Y.S.2d 410, affd. 305 N.Y. 850, 114 N.E.2d 42). The inquiry then is whether on the evidence adduced there is a rational basis for respondent's determination that petitioner's performance was unsatisfactory. Although much of the testimony of offered by petitioner and respondent as to the manner in which petitioner performed his assigned duties related to trifling and insignificant matters, from the record as a whole the court is satisfied that there was a rational basis for respondent's...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Conrad v. Hackett
......rel. Brooklyn Union Gas Company v. Miller, 253 A.D. 162, 1 N.Y.S.2d 246; Litemore Electric Company, Inc. v. Kawecki, 48 Misc.2d 347, 265 N.Y.S.2d 29) in order to preserve an inartfully ...Planning Board, 1 N.Y.2d 508, 154 N.Y.S.2d 849, 136 N.E.2d 827; Adelman v. Bahou, 85 A.D.2d 862, 446 N.Y.S.2d 500; Douglas v. Miller, 55 Misc.2d 303, 285 N.Y.S.2d 174, aff'd. 31 A.D.2d 889, 298 N.Y.S.2d 911.) Specifically, an agency's interpretation of its own rules is ......
-
Patricia R. v. Peter W.
...... delay while awaiting appellate resolution of this issue in that the paternity action would abate upon the death of respondent, (Matter of Douglas v. Miller, 55 . Page 998. Misc.2d 303, 285 N.Y.S.2d 174 (Sup.Ct. Westchester Co.1967), aff'd 31 A.D.2d 889, 298 N.Y.S.2d 911 (2d Dept.1969)), thus, ......
-
Swanno v. Ambach
...78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. Turning to petitioner's rating, it must be upheld if not irrational (Matter of Douglas v. Miller, 55 Misc.2d 303, 285 N.Y.S.2d 174, affd. 31 A.D.2d 889, 298 N.Y.S.2d 911). A determination is irrational if there is no support for it in the record. Subd......
-
Douglas v. Miller
...of counsel for respondent. Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered December 11, 1967, affirmed, with costs. 55 Misc.2d 303, 285 N.Y.S.2d 174. No HOPKINS, Acting P.J., and BENJAMIN, MUNDER, MARTUSCELLO and KLEINFELD, JJ., concur. ...