Dowd v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Decision Date01 March 1966
Docket NumberNo. 65-539,65-539
Citation183 So.2d 558
PartiesNancy M. DOWD, Appellant. v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Wall, Roth & Sheradsky, Miami, for appellant.

Carey, Terry, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Stephens and Edward A. Perse, Miami, for appellee.

Before HENDRY, C. J., and TILLMAN PEARSON and SWANN, JJ.

SWANN, Judge.

Nancy M. Dowd, plaintiff below, appeals from a final decree in chancery, in which the court found that title to an automobile had passed to her prior to an accident, and therefore she could not recover under the uninsured motorist provision of the insurance policy issued by the defendant, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, to a third party, who was the former owner of the motor vehicle.

The plaintiff sued the insurance company for a declaratory decree to determine her rights under the policy. At final hearing, the testimony of the two witnesses present was in conflict as to the essential facts. A final decree was entered against the plaintiff, which stated as follows:

'THIS CAUSE came on for Final Hearing upon the Plaintiff's Petition for Declaratory Decree, on Thursday, April 8, 1965. The plaintiff, NANCY M. DOWD, and a representative of Pan American Motors, one George Pariso, appeared and testified before this Court.

'The Plaintiff, NANCY M. DOWD, was injured in an automobile accident on May 6, 1964, while driving a certain 1959 Oldsmobile. The accident occurred at the intersection of N.W. 27th Avenue and N.W. 14th Street, Miami, Dade County, Florida. The other vehicle involved, a 1951 Plymouth, was uninsured.

'The Plaintiff alleged that the vehicle she was driving at the time of the above accident was owned by Pan American Motors and insured by the Defendants, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, a Maryland corporation, and that she was negotiating for the purchase of said vehicle. Said Insurance Company insured Pan American Motors, and contained in the policy of insurance was a Family Protection Clause providing uninsured motorists, coverage. The Defendant, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, alleged that the vehicle driven by the Plaintiff, NANCY M. DOWD, at the time of the within accident was owned by the plaintiff; that she had purchased said vehicle prior to the accident; and that, therefore, the Defendant, UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY, was not liable under the terms of its policy of insurance.

'After considering the evidence offered by the parties,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Alter v. Finesmith
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 15, 1968
    ...demonstrated that the finding is manifestly unreasonable and clearly against the weight of the evidence. Dowd v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 558. The appellant urges that the finding that a fiduciary relationship existed among the parties is manifestly u......
  • In re Succession of Dangerfield
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • October 31, 2016
    ... ... -------- Notes: 1 The record before us does not contain a copy of Ms. Shropshire's petition, despite Mr. Bowman's ... ...
  • Dutch Inns of America, Inc. v. Jenkins, 73--711
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 3, 1974
    ...See Petrus v. Bunnell, Fla.App.1961, 129 So.2d 702. Upon the record we will not reverse this finding. Dowd v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Fla.App.1966, 183 So.2d 558. Appellant's third point and appellee's cross-appeal each challenge the court's finding as to the amount due. Ea......
  • Copeland v. West Am. Ins. Co., J--257
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 15, 1968
    ...to Mobley, and cites Highway Insurance Company v. Peterson, 186 So.2d 48 (Fla.App.1st, 1966), and Dowd v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, 183 So.2d 558 (Fla.App.3d, 1966). These cases are founded upon theories pertaining to tort liability and are not applicable to that portion ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT