Dowdy v. Palmour
Decision Date | 16 June 1983 |
Docket Number | No. 39560,39560 |
Citation | 304 S.E.2d 52,251 Ga. 135 |
Parties | DOWDY et al. v. PALMOUR. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Andrew Dowdy, pro se.
Douglas W. McDonald, Cornelia, for Andrew Dowdy et al.
Bruce L. Udolf, Dist. Atty., Gainesville, for Judge James E. Palmour, III.
Andrew Dowdy and Douglas W. McDonald, attorneys, were held in contempt of court. Dowdy and McDonald represented a client in a probation revocation hearing before Judge James E. Palmour, III. The probationer was charged with having violated the conditions of his probation by possessing cocaine. When the state called its first witness, Dowdy asked for the rule of sequestration. The judge said: The assistant district attorney called two additional witnesses who were sworn and sent outside the courtroom.
When the state offered two photographs of a vehicle reported to police as having been stolen and in which cocaine was found, the following transpired:
When the defense called its first witness and began direct examination, the following occurred:
The questioning then resumed.
When the probationer's first witness was excused, the following transpired:
At the conclusion of the revocation hearing, the following transpired:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crane, In re
...controversy, it was held that due process required that the attorney's contempt hearing be conducted by another judge. Dowdy v. Palmour, 251 Ga. 135, 304 S.E.2d 52 (1983). "The Federal Constitution, which is of course binding on the states, thus provides a minimum standard, but the state ma......
-
Baptiste v. State
...v. Pennsylvania, 400 U.S. 455, 91 S.Ct. 499, 27 L.Ed.2d 532 (1971); In re Crane, supra at 668, 324 S.E.2d 443; Dowdy v. Palmour, 251 Ga. 135, 304 S.E.2d 52 (1983); Williams v. State, 250 Ga. 664, 665(2), 300 S.E.2d 685 (1983); Jarrard v. State, 163 Ga.App. 99, 101(3), 292 S.E.2d 488 (1982);......
-
HAMILTON CAPTIAL GROUP v. Equifax
...of consumers who met that criteria. This is referred to as "prescreening" potential credit customers. 3. But see Dowdy v. Palmour, 251 Ga. 135, 141(1), 304 S.E.2d 52 (1983), in which the Supreme Court declined to address the issue of whether a finding of contempt without the imposition of p......
-
In re Johnson
...attack, that the contempt ruling was made without due process, is supported by longstanding precedents.Decades ago, in Dowdy v. Palmour , 251 Ga. 135, 304 S.E.2d 52 (1983), the Supreme Court of Georgia recited that "a trial judge has the power, when necessary to maintain order in the courtr......
-
9 Contempt
...conduct [Mayberry v Pa., 400 US 455 (1971)]. A. Must be done immediately after conduct, if using summary procedure Dowdy v. Palmour, 251 Ga. 135, 141-142(2), 304 SE2d 52 (1983)]. B. Notice must contain all factual elements of contemptuous conduct [Mayberry v Pa., 400 US 455 (1971)]; recite ......
-
9 Contempt
...conduct [Mayberry v Pa., 400 US 455 (1971)]. A. Must be done immediately after conduct, if using summary procedure Dowdy v. Palmour, 251 Ga. 135, 141-142(2), 304 SE2d 52 (1983)]. B. Notice must contain all factual elements of contemptuous conduct [Mayberry v Pa., 400 US 455 (1971)]; recite ......
-
9 Contempt
...conduct [Mayberry v Pa., 400 US 455 (1971)]. A. Must be done immediately after conduct, if using summary procedure Dowdy v. Palmour, 251 Ga. 135, 141-142(2), 304 SE2d 52 (1983)]. B. Notice must contain all factual elements of contemptuous conduct [Mayberry v Pa., 400 US 455 (1971)]; recite ......
-
9 Contempt
...conduct [Mayberry v Pa., 400 US 455 (1971)]. A. Must be done immediately after conduct, if using summary procedure Dowdy v. Palmour, 251 Ga. 135, 141-142(2), 304 SE2d 52 (1983)]. B. Notice must contain all factual elements of contemptuous conduct [Mayberry v Pa., 400 US 455 (1971)]; recite ......