Downs v. State
| Decision Date | 11 May 1895 |
| Citation | 31 S.W. 149,60 Ark. 521 |
| Parties | DOWNS v. STATE |
| Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Conway Circuit Court, JEREMIAH G. WALLACE, Judge.
Judgment affirmed.
J. F Sellers for appellant.
The word "upon" renders the indictment uncertain. 27 A. & E. Enc. Law, p. 699. The word "upon" can not be stricken out as surplusage. Whart. Cr. Pl. & Pr. secs. 158 (8 ed.); 10 A. & E. Enc. Law, pp. 545-6, 554. The indictment was not good at common law. 29 Ark. 147; const. art. 2, sec. 8; 140 N.Y. 134. See 26 Ark. 330; 27 id. 493; 34 id. 263; 37 id 408; 41 id. 359; 43 id. 93; 22 S.W. 955.
E. B Kinsworthy, Attorney General, for appellee.
"No indictment is insufficient, nor can the trial judgment or other proceedings thereon be affected by any defect which does not tend to the prejudice of the substantial rights of the defendant on the merits." Sand. & H. Dig. sec. 2076. This section does not conflict with art. 2, sec. 8, constitution, 1874. Appellant could not have misunderstood, or been misled by, the form of the indictment. 55 Ark. 532; 54 Ark. 492-3-4; Ib. 662-3; 49 id. 499. The use of a wrong word will not affect the validity or sufficiency of an indictment, where the meaning is not thereby changed, and the substantial rights of defendant are not thereby prejudiced. 10 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, p. 546; 20 Tex. 450; 103 Ind. 170. If the word is unnecessary or redundant, it will not vitiate the indictment. 10 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law, p. 552; 25 Ala. 64.
Appellant was indicted for and convicted of rape. The indictment against him, omitting the caption, is as follows: "The grand jury of Conway county, in the name and by the authority of the State of Arkansas, accuse Will Downs, of the crime of rape, committed as follows, to wit: The said Will Downs, in the county and State aforesaid, on the first day of December, 1894, in and upon one Polly Bridenbough, a female, forcibly and feloniously did make an assault, and upon her the said Polly Bridenbough, then and there, forcibly and against her will, feloniously did ravish and carnally know, against the peace and dignity of the State of Arkansas."
The only question in the case is, is the indictment sufficient? The appellant insists that it is not, because it does not charge that he ravished or carnally knew Polly Bridenbough. This grows out of the fact that the word "upon." was used once too often. Omitted where it appears the second time, there is no room for the contention. Should it be treated as surplusage in the latter place?
It was evidently used the second time in the indictment through inadvertence. As it appears the last time, it was obviously a clerical error. We cannot see how any one could be misled by it. The intention of the indictment is plain. The word "upon," as used the second time, is manifest surplusage, and should be treated accordingly. We cannot treat it otherwise without disregarding the plain meaning of the indictment, and placing upon it the most absurd and...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. State
... ... quarantine line; and the use of the words of ... "unlawfully" receiving and "unlawfully" ... transporting is merely surplusage. Ballentine v ... State, 48 Ark. 45, 2 S.W. 340; State v ... Bledsoe, 47 Ark. 233, 1 S.W. 149; Moose v ... State, 49 Ark. 499, 5 S.W. 885; Downs v ... State, 60 Ark. 521, 31 S.W. 149. Nor do we think ... that there is any merit in the contention of the defendant ... that the indictment is defective because it does not negative ... the exceptions that are in the statute. The indictment does ... sufficiently negative the exceptions that ... ...
-
Hammons v. State
... ... was convicted, and sentenced to the death penalty, and ... obtained an appeal to this court ... The ... alleged errors will be considered in the order presented ... 1. The ... indictment was sufficient. [*] The form thereof was ... approved in Downs v. State, 60 Ark. 521, 31 ... S.W. 149, and the demurrer thereto was properly overruled ... 2. The ... evidence amply sustains the verdict. The testimony of the ... child was direct and positive, and strongly corroborated. The ... defense attempted to prove that the child ... ...
-
Logan v. State
...witnesses. While a continuance is largely in the discretion of the trial court, this court will not permit an abuse of that discretion. 60 Ark. 521. alleged confession should have been excluded from the jury. Appellant was not warned as to statements made by him. The confession was obtained......
-
Kansas City Southern Ry. Co. v. State
...v. State, 48 Ark. 45, 2 S. W. 340; State v. Bledsoe, 47 Ark. 233, 1 S. W. 149; Moose v. State, 49 Ark. 499, 5 S. W. 885; Downs v. State, 60 Ark. 521, 31 S. W. 149. Nor do we think that there is any merit in the contention of the defendant that the indictment is defective because it does not......