Downs v. State, S98A1631.

Decision Date04 December 1998
Docket NumberNo. S98A1631.,S98A1631.
Citation509 S.E.2d 40,270 Ga. 310
PartiesDOWNS v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Clarence N. Downs, Reidsville, pro se.

Harry N. Gordon, Dist. Atty., Gerald W. Brown, Asst. Dist. Atty., Athens, for the State.

HINES, Justice.

Downs pled guilty to malice murder on January 4, 1995. On May 4, 1998, seven terms of court later, he filed a document styled: "Petitioner Notice of Filing Motion for New Trial on Newly Discovered Evidence." The superior court treated this pleading as a motion to withdraw the guilty plea and dismissed it for lack of jurisdiction because it was out of term. Downs appeals and we affirm.

Downs contends the court should not have treated his pleading as a motion to withdraw a guilty plea but as an extraordinary motion for new trial. One who has entered a plea of guilty cannot move for a new trial, as there was no trial. Lamons v. State, 170 Ga.App. 745, 318 S.E.2d 509 (1984). Thus, even had the court treated the pleading as Downs suggests, the motion was correctly dismissed. There was no error in treating the pleading's substance as a motion to withdraw a guilty plea. See Stevens v. State, 169 Ga.App. 646, 314 S.E.2d 481 (1984).

So treated, the court correctly dismissed the motion. The court's jurisdiction to consider a motion to withdraw a guilty plea ended with the September 1994 term of court in which the judgment of conviction was rendered, and without jurisdiction the motion must be dismissed. Foskey v. State, 232 Ga.App. 303, 304, 501 S.E.2d 856 (1998). "[I]t is well established that after the expiration of the term and of the time for filing an appeal from the conviction, the only remedy available to the defendant for withdrawing a plea is through habeas corpus proceedings." (Punctuation omitted.) Id. at 303, 501 S.E.2d 856.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • White v. State, S04A1278.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • September 13, 2004
    ...(defining terms of Muscogee County Superior Court). 6. Foskey v. State, 232 Ga.App. 303, 501 S.E.2d 856 (1998); Downs v. State, 270 Ga. 310, 509 S.E.2d 40 (1998). 7. Torres v. State, 272 Ga. 389, 392(7), 529 S.E.2d 883 8. Earnest v. State, 262 Ga. 494, 495, 422 S.E.2d 188 (1992). 9. Spencer......
  • Harris v. State, S04A1793.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 22, 2004
    ...conviction, the only remedy available to the defendant for withdrawing a plea is through habeas corpus proceedings." Downs v. State, 270 Ga. 310, 509 S.E.2d 40 (1998), quoting Foskey v. State, 232 Ga.App. 303, 304, 501 S.E.2d 856 (1998). See also White v. State, 278 Ga. 355, 357(2), 602 S.E......
  • Hill v. State, A02A0961.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • August 20, 2002
    ...of court in which the plea was entered and held that the trial court did not err in dismissing the motion. Id. Accord Downs v. State, 270 Ga. 310, 509 S.E.2d 40 (1998) ("court's jurisdiction to consider a motion to withdraw a guilty plea ended with the ... term of court in which the judgmen......
  • Davis v. State, S02A0103.
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • March 11, 2002
    ...15-6-3 (40.1) (C). The only means available to Davis to withdraw his guilty plea is through habeas corpus proceedings. Downs v. State, 270 Ga. 310, 509 S.E.2d 40 (1998); Henry, Because Davis' motion to withdraw the plea was brought against the State in the county of conviction, rather than ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT