Doyle v. Owens, 1D03-5266.
Decision Date | 15 September 2004 |
Docket Number | No. 1D03-5266.,1D03-5266. |
Citation | 881 So.2d 717 |
Parties | Kylie C. DOYLE, Appellant, v. Jason Leigh OWENS, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
E. Jane Brehany, Pensacola, for Appellant.
Caryn A. Van Matre, Pensacola, for Appellee.
Kylie C. Doyle appeals an order granting Jason Leigh Owens unsupervised visitation with the parties' daughter, now four years old. At issue is the effect, under section 61.13(2)(b)2, Florida Statutes (2002), of the father's third degree felony conviction involving domestic violence. We reverse and remand.
Although the order on appeal is non-final, it is reviewable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii) ( ). See § 61.503(4), Fla. Stat. (2002) (); see also McGlamry v. McGlamry, 608 So.2d 553, 554 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)
( ); Johnson v. Henck, 482 So.2d 588, 589 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) ( ); cf. In the Interest of Temp. Custody of L.M. & T.M., 788 So.2d 1114, 1117-18 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) ( ).
After Mr. Owens was released from prison, an order1 was entered authorizing him to visit the parties' daughter once a month under supervision at family visitation centers, principally in Tallahassee, where Ms. Doyle and the child reside. A superseding order allowed two such two-hour visits monthly, one in Tallahassee and one in Pensacola, and was in place when the current phase of the present paternity proceedings began.
in Pensacola, where Mr. Owens also lives. When proceedings resumed at a subsequent hearing, however, Mr. Owens's counsel announced that he was seeking not only supervised visitation overnight — with his mother acting as supervisor — but also unsupervised, daytime visitation. Eventually, the trial court ruled, as follows:
The trial court thus awarded overnight, unsupervised visitation for which Mr. Owens had not asked at any of the hearings at which visitation was discussed.
Ms. Doyle's contention on appeal is that no evidence tended to rebut the statutory presumption against unsupervised visitation2 and that, in any event, the trial court's award of unsupervised visitation failed to "make such arrangements ... as will best protect the child." § 61.13(2)(b)2, Fla. Stat. (2002). Because, she contends, section 61.13(2)(b)2 requires that the court treat Mr. Owens's prior domestic violence conviction as presumptively detrimental to the child and consider his history of abuse as evidence of detriment to the child,3 and because the evidence did not rebut the presumption that unsupervised visitation would be detrimental to the child, the trial court erred in ordering unsupervised visitation. In any event, she also contends, no evidence supports the inherently problematic view that unsupervised visitation "will best protect the child." § 61.13(2)(b) 2, Fla. Stat. (2002).
Because Mr. Owens was previously "convicted of a felony of the third degree or higher involving domestic violence, ... a rebuttable presumption of detriment to the child" arises, broadly precluding shared parental responsibilities of many kinds, and rendering him ineligible for unsupervised visitation, if the presumption is not rebutted. § 61.13(2)(b)2, Fla. Stat. (2002). Section 61.13(2)(b)2 provides:
Evidence that a parent has been convicted of a felony of the third degree or higher involving domestic violence, as defined in s. 741.28 and chapter 775, or meets the criteria of s. 39.806(1)(d), creates a rebuttable presumption of detriment to the child. If the presumption is not rebutted, shared parental responsibility, including visitation, residence of the child, and decisions made regarding the child, may not be granted to the convicted parent.
In an effort to rebut this presumption, Mr. Owens testified that he had taken anger management, parenting and CPR courses, had worked full-time, and had complied with court orders (since violating the domestic violence injunction). His testimony, like that of the family visitation center monitors he called as witnesses, also showed that supervised visitation had gone off without incident.
Even if this evidence was enough to overcome the statutory presumption that visitation would be detrimental to the child, however, it did not prove that unsupervised visitation would "best protect the child." § 61.13(2)(b)2, Fla. Stat. (2002). Section 61.13(2)(b)2 provides:
If the court determines that shared parental responsibility would be detrimental to the child, it may order sole parental responsibility and make such arrangements for visitation as will best protect the child...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Maslow v. Edwards, 5D03-1737.
...Grimaldi v. Grimaldi, 721 So.2d 820 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). This requirement applies in paternity actions. See, e.g., Doyle v. Owens, 881 So.2d 717 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004); Moore v. Trevino, 612 So.2d 604 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Additionally, utilizing the best interest of the child standard does not......
-
Hickey v. Burlinson
...an order modifying visitation rights and awarding attorney's fees as a non-final appeal under rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii)); Doyle v. Owens, 881 So.2d 717, 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (stating that an order granting unsupervised visitation to a father was reviewable under rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii));......
-
Lawrence v. Peyton, 3D08-1665.
...court providing for the legal custody, physical custody, residential care, or visitation with respect to a child."); Doyle v. Owens, 881 So.2d 717, 718 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (applying Rule 9.130(a)(3)(C)(iii) to temporary order granting visitation in pending paternity case); McGlamry v. McGla......
-
Domestic violence
...noticed on the issues of compliance with these conditions precedent to establishment of a time-sharing schedule. CASES • Doyle v. Owens, 881 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). A conviction involving domestic violence is a sufficient basis to require supervised visitation. The conviction create......
-
Parental responsibility
...offense resulting in physical injury or death of one family or household member by another family or household member. [Doyle v. Owens, 881 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (a conviction involving domestic violence is a sufficient basis to require supervised visitation); F.R. v. D.C.F., 826 S......
-
Final judgment; rehearing; motions related to judgment
...that such evidence was considered when evaluating the best interests of the child. [§61.13(3)(m), Fla. Stat.] CASES • Doyle v. Owens, 881 So. 2d 717 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004). A conviction involving domestic violence is a sufficient basis to require supervised visitation. The conviction creates a......