Drago v. Home Ins. Co.

Decision Date25 March 1986
Docket NumberNo. CA,CA
Citation486 So.2d 940
PartiesFrank DRAGO v. The HOME INSURANCE COMPANY. 85 0014.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US

Foye L. Lowe, Jr., Baton Rouge, for plaintiff-appellant Frank Drago.

Michael J. Harig, Baton Rouge, for defendants-appellees Home Ins. Co. et al.

Before EDWARDS, LANIER and PONDER, * JJ.

PONDER, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals dismissal of his tort action on defendants' declinatory exception pleading the objection of lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm.

This is a suit for damages arising out of an alleged slip and fall accident at the Guildwood Inn located in Sarnia, Ontario Province, Canada, on June 18, 1983. Mr. Drago, 77 years of age, a resident and domiciliary of East Baton Rouge Parish both at the time of the accident and of the filing of suit, was a registered guest of the hotel. He filed suit in East Baton Rouge Parish against the Guildwood Inn, a Best Western Inn, its alleged owner, Sheldon Aaron, the inn's insurer, and Best Western.

The exception was supported by Aaron's affidavit which stated that: (1) Guildwood Inn is owned by a Canadian corporation; (2) Aaron, a resident and domiciliary of Ontario Province, is only a stockholder of the said company and not a controlling stockholder; (3) but is the President of the said company; (4) neither Aaron nor Guildwood Inn has or ever has had minimum contacts, business or transaction in or with the said State of Louisiana; (5) the Franchise Agreement between Best Western International, Inc. and Guildwood Inn was not executed in the State of Louisiana; (6) the policy of insurance obtained by the corporation was neither written nor delivered in Louisiana and no premium thereon was paid in Louisiana.

To support his assertion that Best Western solicited business on behalf of 2,800 Best Western facilities "in 1,950 cities worldwide," plaintiff-appellant offered in evidence photocopies of two pages of the "yellow pages" of the Baton Rouge telephone directory.

ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR

Plaintiff assigns as error the trial court's holding that it lacked personal jurisdiction over any of the defendants and, in the alternative, its dismissing the suit without allowing amendments to the petition to remove the jurisdictional ground as a basis for objection.

Plaintiff-appellant contends that the filing of a "request for notice of trial date" on July 9, 1984 by attorneys for the insurer and Guildwood Inn constituted a general appearance and waiver of any objection they would otherwise have had. He cites La.C.C.P. art. 7 as authority for his assertion.

Defendants-appellees contend, on the other hand, that Article 7 explicitly requires a request of relief and excepts from implication of general appearance the enrollment of counsel.

Appellant has cited no case law, and we can find none, which supports his premise that the filing of a form "request for notice of trial date" is a pleading which seeks any relief and so constitutes a waiver. The request for notice was a means chosen to inform plaintiff and the court the identities of the attorneys who would be representing the interests of the named defendants. A common sense interpretation of the pleading is to equate it to the first exception stated in Article 7(A), i.e., entry of the name of an attorney as counsel of record.

Plaintiff asserts that personal jurisdiction exists as to Guildwood Inn, its insurer, and Mr. Aaron by virtue of our Direct Action Statute, La.R.S. 22:655, and our "Long Arm Statute," La.R.S. 13:3201. Mr. Drago fell while attempting to get out of the bathtub when the "grab bar" part of the soap dish, which he was holding onto for support, tore loose from the wall. Medical expenses at the hospital in Sarnia, Ontario, Canada totaled $142.79. Additionally, a variety of medical problems including pneumonia, circulatory deficiencies resulting in ulceration of the foot, bleeding ulcers and aggravation of pre-existing atherosclerosis and diabetes were directly caused by the fall and the cost of medical expenses incurred in Louisiana and Texas was $32,125.99.

La.R.S. 13:3201 confers jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant when one of the jurisdictional bases therein specified is found to be present and the cause of action sued upon arises from one of the enumerated bases. Cambre v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co., 331 So.2d 585, 589 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976), writs denied, 334 So.2d 434 and 435. "One of these bases is the nonresident's ... (d) causing injury or damage in this state by an offense or quasi offense committed through an act or omission outside of this state if he regularly does or solicits any business, or engages in any other persistent course of conduct, or derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed or services rendered, in this state."

Appellees Aaron and Guildwood Inn do not...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Petroleum Helicopters, Inc. v. Avco Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 2, 1986
    ...writs were denied in two of these cases, as well as in Alba and Robinson. Further, in the recent case of Drago v. Home Insurance Co., 486 So.2d 940, 942 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986), Robinson is cited with approval on the "arising from" It seems to me not unreasonable to understand the expression......
  • 1998 -NMCA- 131, Campos Enterprises, Inc. v. Edwin K. Williams and Co.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of New Mexico
    • August 5, 1998
    ... ... that [the franchisor] engaged in any of the activities or transactions" in the complaint); Drago v. Home Ins. Co., 486 So.2d 940, 942 (La.Ct.App.1986) (franchisor relationship insufficient to ... ...
  • Oreck Corp. v. U.S. Floor Systems, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • October 24, 1986
    ...(suit for personal injuries suffered in Belize). The same is true of a recent, post-Farnham Louisiana case, Drago v. Home Ins. Co., 486 So.2d 940 (La.Ct.App. 1st Cir.1986) ("slip and fall" in Canada). Considering U.S. Floor's sales and promotional activities in Louisiana as a whole, we thin......
  • Cadawas v. Skibsaksjeselskapet Storli, Bergin
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
    • December 28, 1993
    ...a general appearance. Norclean's Request for Notice does not constitute a general appearance. The First Circuit in Drago v. Home Ins. Co., 486 So.2d 940 (La.App. 1st Cir.1986) equates a request for notice to the exception in Article 7(A)(1), i.e. entry of the name of an attorney as counsel ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT