Driskell v. United States Health & Accident Ins. Co.

Decision Date05 March 1906
Citation93 S.W. 880,117 Mo. App. 362
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
PartiesDRISKELL v. UNITED STATES HEALTH & ACCIDENT INS. CO.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pettis County; George F. Longan, Judge.

Action by John D. Driskell, administrator, against the United States Health & Accident Insurance Company. From a judgment in favor of defendant, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.

H. T. Williams, for appellant. Shain & Barnett, for respondent.

JOHNSON, J.

Action upon a policy of accident insurance. The petition is as follows: "For his cause of action, the plaintiff states that heretofore, to wit, on the 10th day of February, 1904, the probate court of Pettis county, Missouri, duly appointed him administrator of the estate of John W. Driskell, deceased; that he qualified by giving the required bond as such administrator, and said probate court issued to him letters of administration on said estate; and that he is now the authorized acting administrator in charge of said estate with full power to sue in the courts of Missouri upon all obligations due said estate. Plaintiff states that the defendant is a corporation, carrying on the business of accident insurance in the state of Missouri, with the authority to sue and liability to be sued under the laws of Missouri and in the courts of Missouri. Plaintiff states that heretofore, to wit, on the 29th day of October, 1902, the defendant by its agents in consideration of the premiums, statements, and agreements mentioned in its policy No. 217,918, issued and delivered its said policy of accident insurance to the said John W. Driskell, deceased, which said policy is marked `Exhibit A,' attached to this petition, and filed with the same as a part of the record. Plaintiff states that deceased paid all premiums and performed all conditions by him to be paid and performed under the terms and provisions of said policy, and that the same was in full force at the time of said deceased's injury and death. Plaintiff states that it is provided in said policy that the defendant did thereby insure the said John W. Driskell during the time said policy was in force `in the sum of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) per month, or at that rate for any proportionate part thereof, against loss of time resulting from bodily injuries caused solely and exclusively by external, violent, and accidental means, other than those specified in paragraph "b" of said policy which shall, independently of all other causes, and immediately following the receipt thereof, wholly and continuously disable and prevent the assured from performing any and all duties pertaining to any business or occupation; or, if such injuries should not wholly and continuously disable the assured, but should immediately, wholly, and continuously disable and prevent him from performing one or more important daily duties pertaining to his occupation, or in event of such partial disability following a period of less than twelve months total disability, the company would pay the assured two-fifths of the indemnity per month so specified for a period not exceeding six consecutive months, but the combined period for which indemnity should be paid for any such total and partial disability should not exceed twelve consecutive months.' And that by paragraph `c' of said policy it is provided that `if death should result solely from such injuries, within three months from the date of the accident, the company should pay the principal sum of two hundred dollars ($200.00) to the estate of the said deceased.' That it was provided by paragraph `e' of said policy that `the indemnity in said policy provided should be increased 10 per cent. on any claim accruing thereunder if the premiums thereon should be paid annually in advance, or on any claim originating after the policy should have been maintained in continuous force without default for not less than one year immediately preceeding.'

"Plaintiff states that said deceased paid all premiums without default, and kept said policy in force to the time of his death as therein required. Plaintiff further states that the assured, John W. Driskell, deceased, was, at the time of such insurance, employed as a laborer in the Missouri Pacific railway shops at Sedalia, Missouri,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
79 cases
  • Browning v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States
    • United States
    • Utah Supreme Court
    • June 13, 1938
    ... ... When an insured claims a right to ... recover under the accident provisions of the policy, all he ... need do is bring himself within the ... as a cause." Ward v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of ... Hartford , 82 Neb. 499, 118 N.W. 70, 72 ... The ... 256, 73 S.W ... 592, 61 L. R. A. 459, 97 Am. St. Rep. 560; Driskell ... v. United States Health & Accid. Ins. Co. , 117 ... Mo.App. 362, ... ...
  • United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Hood.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • January 1, 1920
    ... ... The ... provision of an accident policy providing for an autopsy in ... case of death will be construed ... out. In Root v. London Guaranty & Aco ... Ins. Co., 72 N.E. 1150, where the company, on the day ... following ... Co. (Conn.), 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) ... 445; Stull v. U. S. Health & Acci ... Assn. (Ky.), 115 S.W. 234; Thomas v ... Fidelity & C ... 129; Continental Casualty Co. v ... Lloyd, 165 Ind. 52; Driskell v ... United States Health & Acc. Ins. Co., 117 Mo.App ... 362; ... ...
  • Evans v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • December 5, 1946
    ... ... to recover on an accident policy in which the plaintiff was ... named as ... pounds, and was apparently in good health. He was employed by ... the city light department in ... or death.' See, also, Hutton v. States Accident Ins ... Co., 267 Ill. 267, 108 N.E. 296, ... among which is that from United State Mutual Acc ... Association v. Barry, 131 U.S ... We quoted with approval from Driskell v. United States ... Health & Accident Ins. Co., 117 ... ...
  • Rieger v. Mut. Ins. Co. of N.Y.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • December 7, 1937
    ...v. Washington Nat'l Ins. Co. (Mo. App.), 91 S.W. (2d) 169; Wheeler v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. (Mo.), 251 S.W. 924; Driskell v. Insurance Company, 117 Mo. App. 362, 363, 369; Fetter v. Fidelity & Casualty Co., 174 Mo. 256. (5) (a) Although defendant's evidence attempted to show that insured ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT