Droge v. Czarniechi

CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtThe Supreme Court, Kings County, Trial Term, Michael F. Walsh; All concur except CONWAY
CitationDroge v. Czarniechi, 161 N.Y.S.2d 149, 2 N.Y.2d 897 (N.Y. 1957)
Decision Date08 March 1957
Parties, 141 N.E.2d 632 Edward F. DROGE and Lawrence E. Droge, an infant under the age of 14 years, by his Guardian ad Litem, Edward F. Droge, Appellants, v. Edward CZARNIECHI et al., Respondents.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, 285 App.Div. 1052, 139 N.Y.S.2d 314.

Action was brought by father, on behalf of infant son, against hosts of son for injuries sustained by son as result of a fall when the son stepped on a small rug over slippery floor of hosts while attending a party at home of hosts, and the father sought recovery from the hosts for medical expenses and for loss of services.

The Supreme Court, Kings County, Trial Term, Michael F. Walsh, J., 126 N.Y.S.2d 794, entered judgment on a verdict for the father and son, and the hosts appealed.

The Appellate Division, 285 App.Div. 1052, 139 N.Y.S.2d 314, reversed the judgment, dismissed the complaint, and held that where the son was aware, prior to his fall, of the slippery nature of the floor on which the rug had been placed, he took the premises as the hosts, to his knowledge, maintained them, and could not recover for injuries sustained. Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., dissented in part.

The father and the son appealed to the Court of Appeals....

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
4 cases
  • Plotz v. Greene
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 15, 1961
    ...walk upon them--especially the infrequent caller or visitor. Droge v. Czarniechi, 285 App.Div. 1052, 139 N.Y.S.2d 314, affirmed 2 N.Y.2d 897, 161 N.Y.S.2d 149, by a 4 to 3 decision, is distinguishable. There the infant plaintiff was aware, prior to his fall, of the slippery nature of the fl......
  • Krause v. Alper
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 25, 1958
    ...(Klein v. Ramapo Park, 253 App.Div. 824, 1 N.Y.S.2d 321; Droge v. Czarniechi, 285 App.Div. 1052, 139 N.Y.S.2d 314, affirmed 2 N.Y.2d 897, 161 N.Y.S.2d 149). In other words, a social guest, having the status of a licensee, must take the premises as he finds them, and he is entitled to no gre......
  • Gilburt v. Kroll
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • March 8, 1957
  • Coffey v. Flower City Carting & Excavating Co.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • March 8, 1957