Du Bose v. Kelly
Decision Date | 06 May 1938 |
Citation | 181 So. 11,132 Fla. 548 |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Parties | DU BOSE v. KELLY, City Clerk (TRYON, Intervenor). |
Rehearing Denied May 21, 1938.
Suit by John W. Du Bose against Frank J. Kelly, as City Clerk of the City of Miami, to enjoin defendant from proceeding with a recall election, wherein Harry J. Tryon intervened. From an order denying plaintiff's motion for a restraining order plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
BUFORD J., dissenting. Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Paul D Barns, Judge.
Casey, Walton & Spain, Pine & Giblin, Marion E. Sibley, and R. R. Rhudy, all of Miami, and J. Velma Keen and Whitfield & Whitfield, all of Tallahassee, for appellant.
John W. Watson, Jr., of Miami, for appellee Kelly.
George E. McCaskill and Abe Aronovitz, both of Miami, and James Messer, Jr., of Tallahassee, for appellee Tryon.
The parties to this cause in this opinion will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court, as plaintiff and defendant. On the 25th day of April, 1938, plaintiff filed in the circuit court of Dade county, Fla., his bill of complaint seeking a restraining order against the defendant enjoining him from taking certain steps incident to a recall election under the charter provisions of the city of Miami, in which it was alleged that there was not a substantial compliance therewith. The plaintiff is a member of the City Commission of the City of Miami. The material provisions are, viz., chapter 9024, Sp.Acts 1921, as re-enacted by chapter 10847, Sp.Acts 1925 (section 12), which provides:
Also section 12-A of chapter 14234, p. 1353, Sp.Acts 1929, provides as follows:
The initial affidavit, so it is alleged, contained the names of 28 qualified electors of the city of Miami and was drafted under the charter provision supra, and charged the plaintiffs John W. Du Bose, Robert R. Williams, and Ralph B. Ferguson, each commissioners of the city of Miami, substantially as follows:
'1. That said Commissioners, and each of them, have been indicted and now stand indicted by a Grand Jury of Dade County, Florida, for a crime against the State of Florida in connection with their duties and responsibilities as Commissioners of said City and for soliciting or attempting to exact a bribe.
'2. That they, and each of them, have delayed, hindered and obstructed the prosecution of the appeal of the litigation now pending in the United States Court between the Florida Power and Light Company, a corporation, and said City, to the detriment of said City and its citizents.
'3. That they, and each of them, have delayed, hindered and obstructed the prosecution of the appeal of the aforesaid litigation and have thereby delayed consumers of electricity in the City of Miami in obtaining refunds which, in said litigation, have been adjudged to be paid to the citizens of Miami.
'4. That Thomas Grady, an employee of said City, has been indicted and now stands indicted by a Grand Jury of Dade County for a crime against the State of Florida in connection with his duties and responsibilities as an employee of said City in soliciting or attempting to exact a bribe and that said City Commissioners have failed and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Citizens Committee to Recall Rizzo v. Board of Elections of City and County of Philadelphia
... ... incumbent's removal.' 360 Pa. at 310, 62 [470 Pa. 61] ... A.2d at 33. [ 9 ] See also Commonwealth ex rel. Kelly ... v. Sanderson, 11 Pa.County Ct. 593 (C.P. Lack.1891) ... [367 A.2d 263] ... The law on ... this subject was succinctly summarized ... ...
-
Williams v. Keyes
...100 Fla. 566, 129 So. 870; Towns v. State, 102 Fla. 188, 135 So. 822; Duval County v. Jennings, 121 Fla. 584, 164 So. 356.' In DuBose v. Kelly, Fla., 181 So. 11, and in v. Kelly, City Clerk, Fla., 182 So. 881, where previous phases of this general controversy are referred to, it was in effe......
-
Citizens Committee to Recall Rizzo v. Board of Elections of City and County of Philadelphia, 90
...(2nd Dist. 1907) (tenure of office); Campbell v. Johnson, 182 So.2d 244 (Fla.1966) (broad based constitutional attack); DuBose v. Kelly, 132 Fla. 548, 181 So. 11 (1938) (due process); Eckerson v. City of Des Moines, 137 Iowa 452, 115 N.W. 177 (1908) (tenure of office, impeachment); Pinder v......
-
Gordon v. Leatherman
...v. Johnson, 182 So.2d 244 (Fla.1966). 15 Fla.Const. art. 8, § 6 (1968), retaining Fla.Const. art. 8, § 11(i) (1885). 16 DuBose v. Kelly, 132 Fla. 548, 181 So. 11 (1938). 17 Id. 18 Supra, note 9. 19 See, Richard v. Tomlinson, supra; Piver v. Stallman, supra. 20 According to the terms of Sect......