Dublin v. Prime

Decision Date24 December 1990
PartiesJennifer DUBLIN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Chester PRIME, M.D., Appellant, McNeilab, Inc., etc., Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Schiavetti, Begos and Nicholson, New York City (Lori Ann Marano and Kenneth Mauro, of counsel), for appellant. Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York City (Kevin Schlosser and John Winter, of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Prime appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bellard, J.), dated June 19, 1989, as granted the cross motion of the defendant McNeilab, Inc., for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as it is asserted against it. ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. We find that the appeal must be dismissed because the appellant is not aggrieved by the dismissal of the plaintiff's complaint against his codefendant, McNeilab Inc. (see, CPLR 5511; Hauser v. North Rockland Central School Dist. No. 1, 166 A.D.2d 553, 560 N.Y.S.2d 835).

EIBER, J.P., and SULLIVAN, BALLETTA and O'BRIEN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Continental Custom Wood Finishing Corp. v. Chestnut Homes, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 16 March 1998
    ...and Development (see, CPLR 5511; Andrew Keith Props. v. Hubinette Cowell Assocs., --- A.D.2d ----, 663 N.Y.S.2d 856; Dublin v. Prime, 168 A.D.2d 597, 563 N.Y.S.2d 674). Chestnut Homes, Inc., has failed to establish on this record that the plaintiff's causes of action insofar as asserted aga......
  • Continental Custom Wood Finishing Corp. v. Chestnut Homes, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 16 March 1998
    ...Contractor, Inc. (see, CPLR 5511; Andrew Keith Props. v. Hubinette Cowell Assocs., --- A.D.2d ----, 663 N.Y.S.2d 856; Dublin v. Prime, 168 A.D.2d 597, 563 N.Y.S.2d 674). O'BRIEN, J.P., and THOMPSON, SULLIVAN and PIZZUTO, JJ., ...
  • Schultz v. Excelsior Orthopaedics, LLP
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 19 June 2015
    ...for Defendants–Respondents.OpinionIt is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs (see Dublin v. Prime, 168 A.D.2d 597, 563 N.Y.S.2d 674 ).CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, and DeJOSEPH, JJ., ...
  • College Point Associates v. Schorr Bros. Development Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 24 December 1990

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT