Duckett by Duckett v. Payne, 21905
| Decision Date | 20 April 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 21905,21905 |
| Citation | 279 S.C. 94,302 S.E.2d 342 |
| Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | Carse E. DUCKETT, a person non compos mentis, by his Guardian ad Litem, Clarence DUCKETT, Respondent, v. Mary M. PAYNE, Appellant. |
William N. Epps, Jr., Steven M. Krause and Carey B. Murphy, of Epps & Krause, Anderson, for appellant.
Tom Bruce, Greenville, for respondent.
Respondent initiated this action through his Guardian ad Litem to set aside a deed conveying property from himself to appellant. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that the grantor was mentally incompetent at the time he executed the deed. Consequently, the court set aside the deed. We affirm.
Carse Duckett, an elderly widower in his eighties, has six emancipated children including Clarence Duckett, his Guardian ad Litem in this appeal, and appellant. He can neither read nor write, other than to sign his name. He purchased the six acre tract of land in question in 1968 and is presently living there with two of his sons.
In May 1977, appellant petitioned the Probate Court to have her father adjudged mentally incompetent and committed to Crafts-Farrow State Hospital. After an evidentiary hearing in June 1977, the Probate Court adjudged Mr. Duckett to be incompetent and committed him to the State Hospital. That order was unappealed. Furthermore, no one instituted a procedure to have Mr. Duckett's mental capacity readjudged or his legal rights restored.
Mr. Duckett remained at the State Hospital for two months. Thereafter, he lived on his property with his two sons. Seven months later, appellant took Mr. Duckett to live with her. In July 1977, appellant requested a psychiatrist to examine her father to determine if he were competent to deed property. The doctor concluded he was. Two months later, appellant took her father to an attorney's office. The attorney had prepared a deed conveying the six acre tract of land to appellant. The attorney testified that he was never informed that Mr. Duckett had been adjudged incompetent. He stated that he read the deed to Mr. Duckett and that Mr. Duckett thereafter signed it.
Mr. Duckett became ill the same month he signed the deed and was admitted to Anderson Memorial Hospital. Upon his release, he did not return to live with appellant. Instead, he stayed for several months with his grandson. While Mr. Duckett was recovering at his grandson's, appellant served her two brothers with ejectment papers. The two brothers had remained on their father's property. The two brothers agreed to pay "rent" into an escrow account to be divided according to the results of this case. Mr. Duckett has returned to the property and presently is living there with his sons.
The testimony presented at trial concerning Mr. Duckett's mental capacity was conflicting. Appellant offered the testimony of the psychiatrist who examined Mr. Duckett at her request and the attorney who prepared the deed. Both stated they considered Mr. Duckett competent. Respondent offered the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jolly v. Gen. Elec. Co.
...we reject Appellants' argument that Respondents' evidence of substantial causation was insufficient. See Duckett ex rel. Duckett v. Payne , 279 S.C. 94, 96, 302 S.E.2d 342, 343 (1983) ("[T]he appellant carries the burden of convincing this [c]ourt that the [circuit] court erred."); see also......
-
Parker v. Shecut
...the operation of Shecut Investments ceased. We affirm the master's accounting and award of $3,787.13 to Anne. See Duckett v. Payne, 279 S.C. 94, 96, 302 S.E.2d 342, 343 (1983) ("[T]he appellant carries the burden of convincing this Court that the trial court B. Bo's Use and Enjoyment of Joi......
-
Glenn v. 3M Co.
...into evidence, we reject Fisher's argument that Rita's evidence of causation was insufficient. See Duckett ex rel. Duckett v. Payne, 279 S.C. 94, 96, 302 S.E.2d 342, 343 (1983) ("[T]he appellant carries the burden of convincing this [c]ourt that the [circuit] court erred."); see also Curcio......
-
Tiger, Inc. v. Fisher Agro, Inc.
...of the Master, who saw and heard the witnesses and was in a better position to evaluate their credibility. Duckett v. Payne, 279 S.C. 94, 96, 302 S.E.2d 342, 343 (1983); Klutts Resort Realty, Inc. v. Down'round Development Corp., 268 S.C. 80, 91, 232 S.E.2d 20, 26 In addressing any question......