Duddleston v. Grills, 370
Decision Date | 09 January 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 370,370 |
Citation | 385 U.S. 455,87 S.Ct. 611,17 L.Ed.2d 508 |
Parties | Dorothy C. DUDDLESTON et al. v. Nelson G. GRILLS et al |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Benjamin G. Cox and Buena Chaney, for appellants.
John J. Dillon, Atty. Gen. of Indiana, for appellees Branigin and others.
The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the District Court for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, 385 U.S. 440, 87 S.Ct. 569; Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 526, and Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 84 S.Ct. 1362.
Mr. Justice HARLAN and Mr. Justice STEWART are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Preisler v. Secretary of State of Missouri
...on January 9, 1967 and is the law of this case. The same day Preisler II was affirmed, the Supreme Court in Duddleston v. Grills, 385 U.S. 455, 87 S.Ct. 611, 77 L.Ed.2d 508 (1967), vacated the judgment rendered in Grills v. Branigin, S.D.Ind.1966, 255 F.Supp. 155, and remanded that case to ......
-
Calderon v. City of Los Angeles
...remanded a Congressional apportionment case 'for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams * * *.' (Duddleston v. Grills (1967) 385 U.S. 455, 87 S.Ct. 611, 17 L.Ed.2d 508; see also, Kilgarlin v. Hill (1967) 386 U.S. 120, 87 S.Ct. 820, 17 L.Ed.2d 771, voiding a state legislative appor......
-
Wells v. Rockefeller, 66-Civ.-1976.
...III in congressional district cases is disclosed in the Court's brief "Per Curiam" (also January 9, 1967) in Duddleston v. Grills, 385 U.S. 455, 87 S.Ct. 611, 17 L.Ed.2d 508, wherein the Court vacated the lower court's approval of a redistricting plan (Indiana)6 and remanded the case "for f......
-
Grills v. Branigin
...decision to the Supreme Court of the United States. On January 9, 1967, that Court announced its opinion, Duddleston et al. v. Grills et al., 385 U.S. 455, 87 S.Ct. 611, 17 L.Ed.2d 508, vacating the judgment and remanding the case for further consideration in light of Swann v. Adams, 385 U.......