Duffy v. Cole Petroleum Co.
Decision Date | 25 April 1928 |
Docket Number | (No. 918-5001.) |
Parties | DUFFY v. COLE PETROLEUM CO. et al. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Suit by P. J. Duffy against the Cole Petroleum Company and others, in which defendants filed a plea of privilege. The trial court sustained the pleas of privilege, and plaintiff appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which certifies questions to the Commission of Appeals. Questions answered.
K. C. Barkley and A. M. Waugh, both of Houston, for appellant.
Hicks, Hicks, Dickson & Bobbitt, of San Antonio, and Yale Hicks, of Laredo, for appellees.
The following is the certificate from the honorable Court of Civil Appeals for the First Supreme Judicial District, presented to the Supreme Court and referred to this section of the Commission for disposition:
It will be noted that the individual defendants pleaded a privilege in the statutory form claiming the right to be sued in Webb county, from which it is apparent that under article 2007, Revised Statutes of 1925, in the absence of a filing within due time of a controverting affidavit, the plea constituted prima facie proof of the defendants' right to change the venue. The controverting affidavit, which was duly filed within the time prescribed by law, merely says that the corporation defendants are proper parties, having their domicile in Harris county, where the suit was brought. The statute requires that a controverting affidavit shall specifically set out the "fact or facts relied upon to confer venue of such cause on the court where the cause is pending." The parties, claiming the privilege to be sued in their own county, excepted to this controverting plea upon the plea that it did not state the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Fielder v. Parker
...Lloyds Southwest Insurers, Tex.Civ.App., 56 S.W.2d 477. In principle, these decisions, we think, are in conflict with Duffey v. Cole Pet. Co., 117 Tex. 387, 5 S.W.2d 495; Curlee Clothing Co. v. Wickliffe, 126 Tex. 573, 91 S.W.2d 677; Johnson v. Dallas C. & W. Co., 120 Tex. 27, 34 S.W.2d 845......
-
A. H. Belo Corporation v. Blanton
...in the controverting affidavit, or made a part thereof by adoption of such allegations in plaintiff's petition. Duffy v. Cole Pet. Co., 117 Tex. 387, 5 S.W.2d 495; Hudgins v. Hansbro, Tex.Civ.App., 11 S.W.2d 607; Bender v. Kowalski, Tex.Civ.App., 13 S.W.2d 201; Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Loc......
-
Lufkin Nursing Home, Inc. v. Colonial Invest. Corp.
...Jones, 117 Tex. 68, 296 S.W. 865; Greenville Gas & Fuel Co. v. Commercial Finance Co., 117 Tex. 124, 298 S.W. 550: Duffy v. Cole Petroleum Co., 117 Tex. 387, 5 S.W.2d 495; Johnson v. Dallas Cooperage & Woodenware Co., 120 Tex. 27, 34 S.W.2d 845; Berry v. Pierce Petroleum Corporation, 120 Te......
-
High Plains Natural Gas Co. v. City of Perryton, 7874
...Jones, 117 Tex. 68, 296 S.W. 865; Greenville Gas & Fuel Co. v. Commercial Finance Co., 117 Tex. 124, 298 S.W. 550; Duffy v. Cole Petroleum Co., 117 Tex. 387, 5 S.W.2d 495; Johnson v. Dallas Cooperage & Woodenware Co., 120 Tex. 27, 34 S.W.2d 845; Berry v. Pierce Petroleum Corporation, 120 Te......