Duncan v. Duncan
Decision Date | 24 February 1919 |
Citation | 80 So. 697,119 Miss. 271 |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Parties | DUNCAN ET AL. v. DUNCAN |
October 1918
APPEAL from the chancery court of Alcorn county, HON. A. J MCINTYRE, Chancellor.
1 DIVORCE. Custody of children.
The right of the father under the common law to the custody of his legally begotten minor child as against its mother, in a contest between them, has been modified by our statute, Code of 1906, section 1673 (Hemingway's Code, section 1415) to the extent that, while due regard should be paid thereto, the best interest of the child is now the question for prime consideration, and it should be placed in the custody of the parent best calculated, under all the circumstances, to promote its welfare.
2. DIVORCE. Custody of child.
The fact that a father drinks whiskey and plays poker to a limited extent, does not make him an unsuitable person to intrust with the custody of his child.
3. DIVORCE. Custody of minor child.
Where a father is financially able to take care of his minor child and the mother is not, the father will be given the custody of the child, if he is a suitable person.
4. SAME.
The fact that if the mother is given the custody of the child, it will be taken out of the state and thus render the courts of this state powerless to afford the father any relief, he might become entitled to under changed conditions, while not controlling, should be considered along with the other facts in the case.
5. SAME.
Where a husband obtained a divorce on the ground of adultery and hardships will necessarily follow any decree awarding the custody of the child, still justice demands that such hardspips shall fall lightest on the unoffending party.
HON. A. J. MCINTYRE, Chancellor.
Habeas corpus proceedings by Harmon Duncan by next frend, Amanda Duncan, against Geo. B. Duncan, and others. From a decree granting the petition, Geo. B. Duncan and others appeal.
Habeas corpus proceedings by Harmon Duncan by next friend, Amanda Duncan, against Geo. B. Duncan, and others. From a decree granting the petition, Geo. B. Duncan and others appeal.
The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.
Decree reversed and dismissed.
W. C. Sweat, for appellant.
J. M. Boone and Thos. H. Johnston, for appellant.
SMITH, C. J. HOLDEN, J. dissenting. ETHERIDGE, J., joins in the above dissenting opinion.
George B. and Amanda Duncan were formerly husband and wife, and have one child, Harmon Duncan, a boy, to determine the right to the custody of which this habeas corpus proceeding was instituted, and who, when the decree appealed from was rendered, was seven years of age. In September, 1916, trouble arose between Mr. and Mrs. Duncan, because of which they finally separated in March following; George suing for and obtaining a divorce from Amanda on the ground of adultery on the 11th day of February, 1918, in the circuit court of Madison county, Tenn., the decree then entered reciting:
"That defendant is guilty of adultery as charged; though complainant has condoned one offense, there are others proven, and he has not condoned the same, or been guilty of a like offense, and the conditions of his condonation were not complied with."
The child was taken charge of by George, and was placed by him in the care of his (George's) father and mother, J. R. and Sallie Duncan, who live at Corinth, Miss. In July, 1917, a writ of habeas corpus was sued out before Hon A. J. McIntyre, judge of the chancery court of Alcorn county, Miss., by Harmon Duncan, by his mother as his next friend, by which it was sought to have his custody transferred to his mother, and to which his father and grandparents were made defendants. The decree rendered on the trial thereof on August 1, 1917, recites:
On March 16, 1918, a petition was filed in the chancery court of Alcorn county, in the name of Harmon Duncan, by his mother as his next friend, to which George, J. R., and Sallie Duncan were made parties defendant, praying that the custody of the child be awarded to its mother. This petition sets forth the decree entered on the former trial, and avers that Amanda is a proper person to and should have the custody of the child; that "the conditions and circumstances are different from those shown to the court to exist at the former trial;" but does not aver wherein they are different, except an averment, not supported by the evidence, that "George Duncan has since the trial of this case brought whiskey into the state of Mississippi, contrary to the laws of the United States and the laws of the state of Mississippi, to be sold in the state of Mississippi, contrary to the laws of said state." The petition contained a further averment that:
On April 14th the prayer of this petition was granted; the decree then entered, and from which this appeal was taken, reciting that:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mitchell v. Powell, 43628
...425 (1943); Davis v. Davis, 194 Miss. 343, 12 So.2d 435 (1943); Haynie v. Hudgins, 122 Miss. 838, 85 So. 99 (1920); Duncan v. Duncan, 119 Miss. 271, 80 So. 697 (1919); Hibbette v. Baines, 78 Miss. 695, 29 So. 80 (1900); Annot. 51 A.L.R. 838 (1927); Johns v. Johns, 57 Miss. 530 (1879); 25 Am......
-
Fourths v. Warren
... ... Hudgins, 122 Miss. 838, 85 So. 99; ... Steele v. Steele, 152 Miss. 365, 118 So. 721; ... Hayes v. Morgan, 164 So. 880; Duncan v. Duncan, 119 ... Miss. 271, 80 So. 697 ... T. B ... Davis, of Columbia, for appellee ... In the ... case of Hibbette v ... ...
-
Hulett v. Hulett
... ... laid down by this court is that the best interest of the ... child is the thing to be considered. Duncan v. Duncan, 119 ... Miss. 271 ... The ... decree rendered by the court of dates November 29, 1927, and ... modified on December 2nd and ... ...
-
Mercier v. Mercier, 96-CA-00564-SCT
...age that requires this type of special care from her mother. Torrence v. Moore, 455 So.2d 778, 780 (Miss.1984)(citing Duncan v. Duncan, 119 Miss. 271, 80 So. 697 (1919)). Not only can other people care for Dusty as well as her mother, but the record reflects that Steve Mercier does care for......