Dupigney v. Comm'r of Corr.
Decision Date | 31 July 2018 |
Docket Number | AC 39519 |
Citation | 193 A.3d 1274,183 Conn.App. 852 |
Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
Parties | Johnny DUPIGNEY v. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION |
Megan L. Wade, assigned counsel, with whom were Emily Graner Sexton, assigned counsel, and, on the brief, James P. Sexton, Hartford, assigned counsel, for the appellant (petitioner).
Kathryn W. Bare, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Patrick Griffin, state's attorney, and Rebecca Barry, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (respondent).
DiPentima, C.J., and Elgo and Pellegrino, Js.
The petitioner, Johnny Dupigney, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In this certified appeal, the petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly rejected his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our resolution of the petitioner's appeal. "Morris Lewis, the victim, and Herbert Dupigney, the [petitioner's] brother, were partners in an illegal drug selling enterprise in New Haven. The drug sales were conducted primarily at 304 Winthrop Avenue. Other members of the operation included Nick Padmore, an individual known to the [witnesses] in the trial only as ‘Ebony’ and Eric Raven. In December, 1994, following the victim's incarceration, the [petitioner] moved from Boston to New Haven to assist his brother in the drug operation. The [petitioner] also enlisted an acquaintance from Boston, Derrick D'Abreau, to help with the drug sales. D'Abreau moved to New Haven in the beginning of January, 1995.
shortly thereafter." State v. Dupigney , 78 Conn. App. 111, 112–14, 826 A.2d 241, cert. denied, 266 Conn. 919, 837 A.2d 801 (2003).
At the petitioner's criminal trial, the state presented the testimony of three eyewitnesses: D'Abreau, Aisha Wilson, and Padmore. Id., at 121, 826 A.2d 241.
In her testimony, "Wilson identified the [petitioner] as the one who had argued with and later shot the victim. On direct examination, Wilson testified that at approximately 9:30 on the evening of January 24, 1995, she witnessed the victim and three other people engaged in an argument outside her building. Wilson was able to identify two of these people as Herbert Dupigney and an individual known to her only as ‘Ebony.’ ... Her aunt told her that the third individual was Herbert Dupigney's brother.
(Footnote omitted.) Id., at 120–21, 826 A.2d 241.
1 (Footnote added.) Id., at 114–15, 826 A.2d 241. The petitioner's conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Id., at 125, 826 A.2d 241.
Following two unsuccessful actions that concerned DNA evidence; see State v. Dupigney , 309 Conn. 567, 586, 72 A.3d 1009 (2013) ; State v. Dupigney , 295 Conn. 50, 74, 988 A.2d 851 (2010) ; the petitioner commenced the present habeas action. His February 8, 2016 amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus contained eight counts alleging, in relevant part, ineffective assistance of trial counsel.
Following a trial, the habeas court denied the amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In its memorandum of decision, the court disposed of the ineffective assistance of trial counsel claim relevant to this appeal under the prejudice prong of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1984), concluding that the petitioner had "failed to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that there exists a reasonable likelihood that, but for the professional representation alleged, the outcome of the petitioner's criminal trial would have been different." The court subsequently granted the petition for certification to appeal, and this appeal followed.2 In this appeal, the sole issue is whether the petitioner was denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of trial counsel.3
As a preliminary matter, we set forth the standard of review and relevant principles of law that govern our analysis of the petitioner's appeal. (Internal...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Williams v. Warden
... ... guaranteed the petitioner by the sixth amendment." ... Dupigney v. Commissioner of Correction, 183 ... Conn.App. 852, 859 (2018) ... As ... ...
-
Dupigny v. Hannah
...His last name also appears as Dupigney in reported decisions about his conviction and imprisonment. See, e.g, Dupigney v. Comm'r of Correction, 183 Conn. App. 852 (2018). If Dupigny has misspelled his name in the complaint, he should file a notice with the Court requesting a correction. 2. ......
- Martowska v. White, AC 39970
-
Andrews v. Comm'r of Corr.
...result must be substantial, not just conceivable." (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Dupigney v. Commissioner of Correction , 183 Conn. App. 852, 859, 193 A.3d 1274, cert. denied, 330 Conn. 942, 195 A.3d 1135 (2018). We agree with the habeas court that the petitioner fai......