Durham v. State, 27689

Decision Date25 June 1955
Docket NumberNo. 27689,27689
PartiesMaggie DURHAM, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

C. C. Divine, Houston, for appellant.

Dan W. Walton, Dist. Atty., Eugene Brady, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thomas D. White, Asst. Dist. Atty., Houston, Leon Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

WOODLEY, Judge.

The conviction is for the sale of heroin, a narcotic drug, to David W. McNealy who, the evidence reveals, was an undercover agent of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics.

The jury assessed the punishment at two years in the penitentiary.

McNealy testified that on August 16 he was informed that appellant 'would purchase a quantity of heroin', and he went to her to receive the heroin.

He further testified: 'Maggie Durham said she could get a quantity of heroin for me from a person she only referred to as Clarence, and she told me that he could be located, probably, at the El Nedo Tavern in the 3400 Block on Ennis Street here in Houston, Texas, and upon arriving at this El Nedo Tavern she got out of the official government vehicle that I was driving and went inside to look for this person known as Clarence. The defendant told me that she would go into this El Nedo Tavern and look around for this unidentified party known as Clarence, and after going inside, approximately, a minute or so later she came back outside and said that he was in there but that he had only one capsule of heroin in his possession at that time. I then asked her what the price on it would be and she said it would cost $6. I then gave her $6 of official United States Government Advance Funds, and the defendant got the $6 and went back inside and she was gone approximately a minute, then, she came back and gave me one capsule of alleged heroin wrapped in a piece of cellophane paper.'

On cross-examination he testified:

'Q. And you knew the purpose for which she was going to use that--what was it, $6? A. Yes, sir.

'Q. You knew, then she was going to use the $6 to purchase a capsule of heroin, is that true? A. Yes, sir.

'Q. You went with her to purchase it? A. Yes, sir.

* * *

* * *

'Q. Now, do you recall the conversation, exactly, that you had with Maggie Durham on that day about the purchase of heroin? A. Yes, sir, I do.

'Q. Would you repeat it for the sake of the jury and this Court, please? A. Yes, sir. The defendant, Maggie Durham, that is, told me that I needn't be cagey, that she knew that I wanted to buy heroin. She stated that she knew several persons that she could purchase this heroin from, and don't worry about tipping off the police or anything about the transaction because she knew that I was an underworld character, and that the person she knew wouldn't tip off because they would be afraid of incriminating themselves, and she further stated that she would take me right exactly to the places in order to purchase these narcotic drugs.

'Q. All right, is that all the conversation you had with her? A. No, sir, it is not; then she said that she would direct us to the place in the automobile, that is, with the informer and myself.

'Q. I didn't hear that, state it over, please. A. She said that she would show the informer and myself the exact locations, and she would purchase the heroin, but then we got in the official government vehicle, driven by myself, without the informer, because he was afraid of being recognized with me, and he was afraid of retaliations; then I drove the defendant to the place.

'Q. Repeat that, please. A. The informer didn't want to be seen in my presence, sir, because he was afraid of retaliations that might be afflicted upon himself by the underworld.

'Q. I see. Go ahead, please. A. So he got out of the vehicle after telling me why he didn't want to go along, in confidence, then the defendant carried me to this El Nedo Tavern, and told me to wait inside the vehicle while she went in to see if this under-world character known as Clarence was there. After about five minutes, the defendant, Maggie Durham, returned and said that Clarence was there and had only one capsule of heroin left; that he had sold the rest of it the previous night, and he had questioned her as to my identity and she assured him that I was all right.

'Q. Did you hear this? A. That is what the defendant told me.

'Q. I see, she was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • Posey v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • 13 d3 Novembro d3 1974
    ...agency is no defense in such prosecutions. Accommodation agency as applied in narcotics cases began with Durham v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 25, 280 S.W.2d 737 (1955). In Durham the Court applied the doctrine of accommodation agency that had been applied in prosecutions for the sale of liquor in......
  • Com. v. Simione
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • 20 d4 Abril d4 1972
    ...118 N.E.2d 361 . . ..' (Emphasis supplied.) To the same effect see Jones v. State, 481 P.2d 169 (Okl.Cr.App.1971); Durham v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 25, 280 S.W.2d 737 (1955); Smith v. State, 396 S.W.2d 876 (Tex.Ct.Crim.App.1965); United States v. Moses, 220 F.2d 166 (3rd Cir. 1955); United St......
  • Roy v. State
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Nevada
    • 2 d2 Novembro d2 1971
    ...a circuit judge. The propriety of such an instruction is also generally supported by numerous other authorities, e.g.: Durham v. State, 280 S.W.2d 737 (Tex.Cr.App.1955); People v. Buster, 286 App.Div. 1141, 145 N.Y.S.2d 437 (1955); Townsel v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 433, 286 S.W.2d 162 (1956);......
  • State v. Schultz
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Utah
    • 4 d4 Maio d4 1972
    ...v. State (footnote 2), which particularly fits the facts of the instant case, where the court said: We think that the New York cases and the Durham case are correct and reject the view that one who acts only as an agent, servant or employee of a law enforcement officer in the purchase of na......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Texas Criminal Jury Charges. Volume 1-2 Volume 2
    • 4 d2 Maio d2 2021
    ...1:80 Duke v. State 865 S.W.2d 466 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993) 12:110 Dunn v. State 721 S.W.2d 325 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) 3:590 Durham v. State 280 S.W.2d 737 (Tex. Crim. App. 1955) 13:40 Dusek v. State 978 S.W.2d 129 (Tex. App.—Austin 1998, pet. ref’d) 1:200 Dusky v. U.S. 362 U.S. 402 (1960). 3:......
  • Controlled substances
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Texas Criminal Jury Charges. Volume 1-2 Volume 2
    • 4 d2 Maio d2 2021
    ...law enforcement authorities he is not guilty of making a sale. Smith v. State , 396 S.W.2d 876 (Tex.Crim.App. 1965); Durham v. State , 162 Tex.Crim. 25, 280 S.W.2d 737 (1955); Townsel v. State , 162 Tex.Crim. 433, 286 S.W.2d 162 (1956). If the law enforcement officer represented cannot be f......
  • New Techniques in Defending Drug Cases
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 4-5, May 1975
    • Invalid date
    ...Laws 1971, C.119, §§ 2-101 et. seq. 25. 356 Mass. 452, 253 N.E.2d 346 (Mass. 1969). 26. 253 N.E.2d at 348, 349. 27. 162 Tex. Cr. R. 25, 280 S.W.2d 737 (1955). 28. 280 S.W.2d at 739. 29. 162 Tex. Cr. R. 433, 286 S.W.2d 162 (1956). 30. 396 S.W.2d 876 (1965). 31. 15 Ill. 2d 494, 155 N.E.2d 578......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT